% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Ernst:829879,
      author       = {Ernst, Anna and Fischer-Hotzel, Andrea and Schumann, Diana},
      title        = {{T}ransforming knowledge for sustainability: {I}nsights
                      from an inclusive science-practice dialogue on low-carbon
                      society in {G}ermany},
      journal      = {Energy research $\&$ social science},
      volume       = {29},
      issn         = {2214-6296},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2017-03495},
      pages        = {23 - 35},
      year         = {2017},
      abstract     = {In order to combat climate change and reduce carbon dioxide
                      emissions as suggested by the Intergovernmental Panel on
                      Climate Change (IPCC), the contemplation of different
                      knowledge types is discussed as a leverage point for
                      transforming towards sustainability. In order to analyse how
                      a science-practice dialogue can improve the understanding of
                      transformation processes towards low-carbon societies, we
                      set up a dialogue process in North Rhine-Westphalia to
                      envision a low-carbon future. We addressed the deficits of
                      previous transdisciplinary projects and tested different
                      dialogue formats. The approach applied put us scientists in
                      the unusual position as facilitators of dialogue. This
                      contained some challenges but also offered an in-depth
                      understanding of the science-practice dialogue that would
                      not been possible with traditional scientific methods. The
                      participating stakeholder perceived bringing together
                      different actors with complementary knowledge and experience
                      and associated mutual learning as beneficial. However, the
                      wish not only to gain knowledge but to influence decision
                      making determines whether a dialogue process is perceived as
                      effective. We found that envisioning processes are valuable
                      to explore highly uncertain future processes. In addition,
                      the envisioning workshop revealed the actual source of
                      conflicts and thus, creates an effective dialogue by
                      addressing the actual differences and not the symptoms.},
      cin          = {IEK-STE},
      ddc          = {624},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013},
      pnm          = {153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of
                      Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153) /
                      $R\&DIALOGUE$ - Research and Civil Society Dialogue towards
                      a low-carbon society (288980)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153 / G:(EU-Grant)288980},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000406897400003},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.erss.2017.04.006},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/829879},
}