001     830453
005     20240712101019.0
024 7 _ |a 10.5194/amt-10-2021-2017
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1867-1381
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1867-8548
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/14625
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000403221100001
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a altmetric:21833982
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2017-03998
082 _ _ |a 550
100 1 _ |a Deshler, Terry
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Methods to homogenize electrochemical concentration cell (ECC) ozonesonde measurements across changes in sensing solution concentration or ozonesonde manufacturer
260 _ _ |a Katlenburg-Lindau
|c 2017
|b Copernicus
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1496843305_1595
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Ozone plays a significant role in the chemical and radiative state of the atmosphere. For this reason there are many instruments used to measure ozone from the ground, from space, and from balloons. Balloon-borne electrochemical cell ozonesondes provide some of the best measurements of the ozone profile up to the mid-stratosphere, providing high vertical resolution, high precision, and a wide geographic distribution. From the mid-1990s to the late 2000s the consistency of long-term records from balloon-borne ozonesondes has been compromised by differences in manufacturers, Science Pump (SP) and ENSCI (EN), and differences in recommended sensor solution concentrations, 1.0 % potassium iodide (KI) and the one-half dilution: 0.5 %. To investigate these differences, a number of organizations have independently undertaken comparisons of the various ozonesonde types and solution concentrations, resulting in 197 ozonesonde comparison profiles. The goal of this study is to derive transfer functions to allow measurements outside of standard recommendations, for sensor composition and ozonesonde type, to be converted to a standard measurement and thus homogenize the data to the expected accuracy of 5 % (10 %) in the stratosphere (troposphere). Subsets of these data have been analyzed previously and intermediate transfer functions derived. Here all the comparison data are analyzed to compare (1) differences in sensor solution composition for a single ozonesonde type, (2) differences in ozonesonde type for a single sensor solution composition, and (3) the World Meteorological Organization's (WMO) and manufacturers' recommendations of 1.0 % KI solution for Science Pump and 0.5 % KI for ENSCI. From the recommendations it is clear that ENSCI ozonesondes and 1.0 % KI solution result in higher amounts of ozone sensed. The results indicate that differences in solution composition and in ozonesonde type display little pressure dependence at pressures  ≥  30 hPa, and thus the transfer function can be characterized as a simple ratio of the less sensitive to the more sensitive method. This ratio is 0.96 for both solution concentration and ozonesonde type. The ratios differ at pressures < 30 hPa such that OZ0. 5%/OZ1. 0 % =  0. 90 + 0. 041 ⋅ log10(p) and OZSciencePump/OZENSCI =  0. 764 + 0. 133 ⋅ log10(p) for p in units of hPa. For the manufacturer-recommended solution concentrations the dispersion of the ratio (SP-1.0 / EN-0.5 %), while significant, is generally within 3 % and centered near 1.0, such that no changes are recommended. For stations which have used multiple ozonesonde types with solution concentrations different from the WMO's and manufacturer's recommendations, this work suggests that a reasonably homogeneous data set can be created if the quantitative relationships specified above are applied to the non-standard measurements. This result is illustrated here in an application to the Nairobi data set.
536 _ _ |a 243 - Tropospheric trace substances and their transformation processes (POF3-243)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-243
|c POF3-243
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Stübi, Rene
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Schmidlin, Francis J.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Mercer, Jennifer L.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Smit, Herman G.J.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)16203
|b 4
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Johnson, Bryan J.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Kivi, Rigel
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Nardi, Bruno
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
773 _ _ |a 10.5194/amt-10-2021-2017
|g Vol. 10, no. 6, p. 2021 - 2043
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2505596-3
|n 6
|p 2021 - 2043
|t Atmospheric measurement techniques
|v 10
|y 2017
|x 1867-8548
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/830453/files/amt-10-2021-2017.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/830453/files/amt-10-2021-2017.gif?subformat=icon
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-1440
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/830453/files/amt-10-2021-2017.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-180
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/830453/files/amt-10-2021-2017.jpg?subformat=icon-180
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-640
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/830453/files/amt-10-2021-2017.jpg?subformat=icon-640
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/830453/files/amt-10-2021-2017.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:830453
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p driver
|p VDB:Earth_Environment
|p VDB
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)16203
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Atmosphäre und Klima
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-240
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-243
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200
|v Tropospheric trace substances and their transformation processes
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Erde und Umwelt
914 1 _ |y 2017
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY3
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b ATMOS MEAS TECH : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013
|k IEK-8
|l Troposphäre
|x 0
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-3-20101013


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21