Home > Publications database > Collective phenomena in crowds—Where pedestrian dynamics need social psychology > print

001     830494
005     20220930130124.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1371/journal.pone.0177328
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/14641
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000402880700007
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a altmetric:16698419
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a pmid:28591142
|2 pmid
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2017-04035
082 _ _ |a 500
100 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Sieben, Anna
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Collective phenomena in crowds—Where pedestrian dynamics need social psychology
260 _ _ |a Lawrence, Kan.
|b PLoS
|c 2017
336 7 _ |2 DRIVER
|a article
336 7 _ |2 DataCite
|a Output Types/Journal article
336 7 _ |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
|a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|s 1496987718_23580
336 7 _ |2 BibTeX
|a ARTICLE
336 7 _ |2 ORCID
|a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
336 7 _ |0 0
|2 EndNote
|a Journal Article
520 _ _ |a This article is on collective phenomena in pedestrian dynamics during the assembling and dispersal of gatherings. To date pedestrian dynamics have been primarily studied in the natural and engineering sciences. Pedestrians are analyzed and modeled as driven particles revealing self-organizing phenomena and complex transport characteristics. However, pedestrians in crowds also behave as living beings according to stimulus-response mechanisms or act as human subjects on the basis of social norms, social identities or strategies. To show where pedestrian dynamics need social psychology in addition to the natural sciences we propose the application of three categories–phenomena, behavior and action. They permit a clear discrimination between situations in which minimal models from the natural sciences are appropriate and those in which sociological and psychological concepts are needed. To demonstrate the necessity of this framework, an experiment in which a large group of people (n = 270) enters a concert hall through two different spatial barrier structures is analyzed. These two structures correspond to everyday situations such as boarding trains and access to immigration desks. Methods from the natural and social sciences are applied. Firstly, physical measurements show the influence of the spatial structure on the dynamics of the entrance procedure. Density, waiting time and speed of progress show large variations. Secondly, a questionnaire study (n = 60) reveals how people perceive and evaluate these entrance situations. Markedly different expectations, social norms and strategies are associated with the two spatial structures. The results from the questionnaire study do not always conform to objective physical measures, indicating the limitations of models which are based on objective physical measures alone and which neglect subjective perspectives.
536 _ _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-511
|a 511 - Computational Science and Mathematical Methods (POF3-511)
|c POF3-511
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)142414
|a Schumann, Jette
|b 1
|u fzj
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)132266
|a Seyfried, Armin
|b 2
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |0 PERI:(DE-600)2267670-3
|a 10.1371/journal.pone.0177328
|g Vol. 12, no. 6, p. e0177328 -
|n 6
|p e0177328 -
|t PLoS one
|v 12
|x 1932-6203
|y 2017
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/830494/files/journal.pone.0177328.pdf
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/830494/files/journal.pone.0177328.gif?subformat=icon
|x icon
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/830494/files/journal.pone.0177328.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
|x icon-1440
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/830494/files/journal.pone.0177328.jpg?subformat=icon-180
|x icon-180
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/830494/files/journal.pone.0177328.jpg?subformat=icon-640
|x icon-640
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/830494/files/journal.pone.0177328.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:830494
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)132266
|a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|b 2
|k FZJ
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)132266
|a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|b 2
|k FZJ
913 1 _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-511
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-510
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|v Computational Science and Mathematical Methods
|x 0
|l Supercomputing & Big Data
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2017
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
|a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1040
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Zoological Record
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|a JCR
|b PLOS ONE : 2015
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b DOAJ Seal
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b DOAJ
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|a WoS
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|a IF < 5
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
|a OpenAccess
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|a Peer Review
|b ASC
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Medline
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406
|k JSC
|l Jülich Supercomputing Center
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406
980 _ _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21