000830525 001__ 830525
000830525 005__ 20210129230531.0
000830525 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.075
000830525 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1053-8119
000830525 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1095-9572
000830525 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000403384500031
000830525 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:15309752
000830525 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:28082105
000830525 037__ $$aFZJ-2017-04059
000830525 082__ $$a610
000830525 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131804$$aWarbrick, Tracy$$b0
000830525 245__ $$aThe relationship between BOLD fMRI response and the underlying white matter as measured by fractional anisotropy (FA): A systematic review
000830525 260__ $$aOrlando, Fla.$$bAcademic Press$$c2017
000830525 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000830525 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000830525 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1497012176_12001
000830525 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000830525 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000830525 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000830525 520__ $$aDespite the relationship between brain structure and function being of fundamental interest in cognitive neuroscience, the relationship between the brain's white matter, measured using fractional anisotropy (FA), and the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) response is poorly understood. A systematic review of literature investigating the association between FA and fMRI BOLD response was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The PubMed and Web of Knowledge databases were searched up until 22.04.2016 using a predetermined set of search criteria. The search identified 363 papers, 28 of which met the specified inclusion criteria. Positive relationships were mainly observed in studies investigating the primary sensory and motor systems and in resting state data. Both positive and negative relationships were seen in studies using cognitive tasks. This systematic review suggests that there is a relationship between FA and the fMRI BOLD response and that the relationship is task and region dependent. Behavioural and/or clinical variables were shown to be essential in interpreting the relationships between imaging measures. The results highlight the heterogeneity in the methods used across papers in terms of fMRI task, population investigated and data analysis techniques. Further investigation and replication of current findings are required before definitive conclusions can be drawn
000830525 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-573$$a573 - Neuroimaging (POF3-573)$$cPOF3-573$$fPOF III$$x0
000830525 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000830525 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)141935$$aRosenberg, Jessica$$b1$$eCorresponding author
000830525 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131794$$aShah, N. J.$$b2
000830525 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1471418-8$$a10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.075$$gVol. 153, p. 369 - 381$$p369 - 381$$tNeuroImage$$v153$$x1053-8119$$y2017
000830525 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/830525/files/1-s2.0-S1053811916308035-main.pdf$$yRestricted
000830525 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/830525/files/1-s2.0-S1053811916308035-main.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yRestricted
000830525 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/830525/files/1-s2.0-S1053811916308035-main.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yRestricted
000830525 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/830525/files/1-s2.0-S1053811916308035-main.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yRestricted
000830525 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/830525/files/1-s2.0-S1053811916308035-main.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yRestricted
000830525 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/830525/files/1-s2.0-S1053811916308035-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000830525 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:830525$$pVDB
000830525 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)141935$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000830525 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131794$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000830525 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-573$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lDecoding the Human Brain$$vNeuroimaging$$x0
000830525 9141_ $$y2017
000830525 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000830525 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000830525 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000830525 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000830525 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bNEUROIMAGE : 2015
000830525 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000830525 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000830525 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000830525 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000830525 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000830525 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000830525 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences
000830525 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000830525 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9905$$2StatID$$aIF >= 5$$bNEUROIMAGE : 2015
000830525 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406$$kINM-4$$lPhysik der Medizinischen Bildgebung$$x0
000830525 9201_ $$0I:(DE-82)080010_20140620$$kJARA-BRAIN$$lJARA-BRAIN$$x1
000830525 980__ $$ajournal
000830525 980__ $$aVDB
000830525 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406
000830525 980__ $$aI:(DE-82)080010_20140620
000830525 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED