% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Warbrick:830525,
      author       = {Warbrick, Tracy and Rosenberg, Jessica and Shah, N. J.},
      title        = {{T}he relationship between {BOLD} f{MRI} response and the
                      underlying white matter as measured by fractional anisotropy
                      ({FA}): {A} systematic review},
      journal      = {NeuroImage},
      volume       = {153},
      issn         = {1053-8119},
      address      = {Orlando, Fla.},
      publisher    = {Academic Press},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2017-04059},
      pages        = {369 - 381},
      year         = {2017},
      abstract     = {Despite the relationship between brain structure and
                      function being of fundamental interest in cognitive
                      neuroscience, the relationship between the brain's white
                      matter, measured using fractional anisotropy (FA), and the
                      functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) blood oxygen
                      level dependent (BOLD) response is poorly understood. A
                      systematic review of literature investigating the
                      association between FA and fMRI BOLD response was conducted
                      following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for
                      Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The PubMed
                      and Web of Knowledge databases were searched up until
                      22.04.2016 using a predetermined set of search criteria. The
                      search identified 363 papers, 28 of which met the specified
                      inclusion criteria. Positive relationships were mainly
                      observed in studies investigating the primary sensory and
                      motor systems and in resting state data. Both positive and
                      negative relationships were seen in studies using cognitive
                      tasks. This systematic review suggests that there is a
                      relationship between FA and the fMRI BOLD response and that
                      the relationship is task and region dependent. Behavioural
                      and/or clinical variables were shown to be essential in
                      interpreting the relationships between imaging measures. The
                      results highlight the heterogeneity in the methods used
                      across papers in terms of fMRI task, population investigated
                      and data analysis techniques. Further investigation and
                      replication of current findings are required before
                      definitive conclusions can be drawn},
      cin          = {INM-4 / JARA-BRAIN},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406 / $I:(DE-82)080010_20140620$},
      pnm          = {573 - Neuroimaging (POF3-573)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-573},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000403384500031},
      pubmed       = {pmid:28082105},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.075},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/830525},
}