001     830525
005     20210129230531.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.075
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1053-8119
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1095-9572
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a WOS:000403384500031
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a altmetric:15309752
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a pmid:28082105
|2 pmid
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2017-04059
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Warbrick, Tracy
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131804
|b 0
245 _ _ |a The relationship between BOLD fMRI response and the underlying white matter as measured by fractional anisotropy (FA): A systematic review
260 _ _ |a Orlando, Fla.
|c 2017
|b Academic Press
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1497012176_12001
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Despite the relationship between brain structure and function being of fundamental interest in cognitive neuroscience, the relationship between the brain's white matter, measured using fractional anisotropy (FA), and the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) response is poorly understood. A systematic review of literature investigating the association between FA and fMRI BOLD response was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The PubMed and Web of Knowledge databases were searched up until 22.04.2016 using a predetermined set of search criteria. The search identified 363 papers, 28 of which met the specified inclusion criteria. Positive relationships were mainly observed in studies investigating the primary sensory and motor systems and in resting state data. Both positive and negative relationships were seen in studies using cognitive tasks. This systematic review suggests that there is a relationship between FA and the fMRI BOLD response and that the relationship is task and region dependent. Behavioural and/or clinical variables were shown to be essential in interpreting the relationships between imaging measures. The results highlight the heterogeneity in the methods used across papers in terms of fMRI task, population investigated and data analysis techniques. Further investigation and replication of current findings are required before definitive conclusions can be drawn
536 _ _ |a 573 - Neuroimaging (POF3-573)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-573
|c POF3-573
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Rosenberg, Jessica
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)141935
|b 1
|e Corresponding author
700 1 _ |a Shah, N. J.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131794
|b 2
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.075
|g Vol. 153, p. 369 - 381
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1471418-8
|p 369 - 381
|t NeuroImage
|v 153
|y 2017
|x 1053-8119
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/830525/files/1-s2.0-S1053811916308035-main.pdf
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/830525/files/1-s2.0-S1053811916308035-main.gif?subformat=icon
|x icon
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/830525/files/1-s2.0-S1053811916308035-main.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
|x icon-1440
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/830525/files/1-s2.0-S1053811916308035-main.jpg?subformat=icon-180
|x icon-180
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/830525/files/1-s2.0-S1053811916308035-main.jpg?subformat=icon-640
|x icon-640
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/830525/files/1-s2.0-S1053811916308035-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
|y Restricted
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:830525
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)141935
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131794
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Decoding the Human Brain
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-573
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v Neuroimaging
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2017
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b NEUROIMAGE : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b NEUROIMAGE : 2015
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406
|k INM-4
|l Physik der Medizinischen Bildgebung
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-82)080010_20140620
|k JARA-BRAIN
|l JARA-BRAIN
|x 1
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-82)080010_20140620
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21