001     834516
005     20220930130126.0
024 7 _ |a 10.5194/acp-17-8045-2017
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1680-7316
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1680-7324
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/14835
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000404773700002
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a altmetric:21503074
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2017-04447
082 _ _ |a 550
100 1 _ |a Hoffmann, Lars
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129125
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Intercomparison of meteorological analyses and trajectories in the Antarctic lower stratosphere with Concordiasi superpressure balloon observations
260 _ _ |a Katlenburg-Lindau
|c 2017
|b EGU
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1499325296_15390
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a In this study we compared temperatures and horizontal winds of meteorological analyses in the Antarctic lower stratosphere, a region of the atmosphere that is of major interest regarding chemistry and dynamics of the polar vortex. The study covers the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) operational analysis, the ERA-Interim reanalysis, the Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications version 1 and 2 (MERRA and MERRA-2), and the National Centers for Environmental Prediction and National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP/NCAR) reanalysis. The comparison was performed with respect to long-duration observations from 19 superpressure balloon flights during the Concordiasi field campaign in September 2010 to January 2011. Most of the balloon measurements were conducted at altitudes of 17–18.5 km and latitudes of 60–85° S. We found that large-scale state temperatures of the analyses have a mean precision of 0.5–1.4 K and a warm bias of 0.4–2.1 K with respect to the balloon data. Zonal and meridional winds have a mean precision of 0.9–2.3 m s−1 and a bias below ±0.5 m s−1. Standard deviations related to small-scale fluctuations due to gravity waves are reproduced at levels of 15–60 % for temperature and 30–60 % for the horizontal winds. Considering the fact that the balloon observations have been assimilated into all analyses, except for NCEP/NCAR, notable differences found here indicate that other observations, the forecast models, and the data assimilation procedures have a significant impact on the analyses as well. We also used the balloon observations to evaluate trajectory calculations with our new Lagrangian transport model Massive-Parallel Trajectory Calculations (MPTRAC), where vertical motions of simulated trajectories were nudged to pressure measurements of the balloons. We found relative horizontal transport deviations of 4–12 % and error growth rates of 60–170 km day−1 for 15-day trajectories. Dispersion simulations revealed some difficulties with the representation of subgrid-scale wind fluctuations in MPTRAC, as the spread of air parcels simulated with different analyses was not consistent. However, although case studies suggest that the accuracy of trajectory calculations is influenced by meteorological complexity, diffusion generally does not contribute significantly to transport deviations in our analysis. Overall, evaluation results are satisfactory and compare well to earlier studies using superpressure balloon observations.
536 _ _ |a 511 - Computational Science and Mathematical Methods (POF3-511)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-511
|c POF3-511
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Hertzog, Albert
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Rössler, Thomas
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)151377
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Stein, Olaf
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)3709
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Wu, Xue
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)169305
|b 4
773 _ _ |a 10.5194/acp-17-8045-2017
|g Vol. 17, no. 13, p. 8045 - 8061
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2069847-1
|n 13
|p 8045 - 8061
|t Atmospheric chemistry and physics
|v 17
|y 2017
|x 1680-7324
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/834516/files/acp-17-8045-2017.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/834516/files/acp-17-8045-2017.gif?subformat=icon
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-1440
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/834516/files/acp-17-8045-2017.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-180
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/834516/files/acp-17-8045-2017.jpg?subformat=icon-180
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-640
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/834516/files/acp-17-8045-2017.jpg?subformat=icon-640
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/834516/files/acp-17-8045-2017.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:834516
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129125
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)151377
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)3709
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)169305
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-510
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-511
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v Computational Science and Mathematical Methods
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|l Supercomputing & Big Data
914 1 _ |y 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b ATMOS CHEM PHYS : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b ATMOS CHEM PHYS : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406
|k JSC
|l Jülich Supercomputing Center
|x 0
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406
980 _ _ |a APC


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21