% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Vogeley:834652,
      author       = {Vogeley, Kai},
      title        = {{T}wo social brains: neural mechanisms of
                      intersubjectivity},
      journal      = {Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London /
                      B},
      volume       = {372},
      number       = {1727},
      issn         = {1471-2970},
      address      = {London},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2017-04556},
      pages        = {20160245 -},
      year         = {2017},
      abstract     = {It is the aim of this article to present an empirically
                      justified hypothesis about the functional roles of the two
                      social neural systems, namely the so-called ‘mirror neuron
                      system’ (MNS) and the ‘mentalizing system’ (MENT, also
                      ‘theory of mind network’ or ‘social neural
                      network’). Both systems are recruited during cognitive
                      processes that are either related to interaction or
                      communication with other conspecifics, thereby constituting
                      intersubjectivity. The hypothesis is developed in the
                      following steps: first, the fundamental distinction that we
                      make between persons and things is introduced; second,
                      communication is presented as the key process that allows us
                      to interact with others; third, the capacity to
                      ‘mentalize’ or to understand the inner experience of
                      others is emphasized as the fundamental cognitive capacity
                      required to establish successful communication. On this
                      background, it is proposed that MNS serves comparably early
                      stages of social information processing related to the
                      ‘detection’ of spatial or bodily signals, whereas MENT
                      is recruited during comparably late stages of social
                      information processing related to the ‘evaluation’ of
                      emotional and psychological states of others. This
                      hypothesis of MNS as a social detection system and MENT as a
                      social evaluation system is illustrated by findings in the
                      field of psychopathology. Finally, new research questions
                      that can be derived from this hypothesis are discussed.},
      cin          = {INM-3},
      ddc          = {570},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000404628900013},
      pubmed       = {pmid:28673921},
      doi          = {10.1098/rstb.2016.0245},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/834652},
}