% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Geselbracht:834691,
author = {Geselbracht, P. and Schneidewind, A. and Doerr, M. and
Granovsky, S. and Rotter, M. and Loewenhaupt, M. and
Scheerer, G. W. and Ren, Z. and Prokeš, K.},
title = {{M}agnetic phase diagram of {C}e{C}u 2 {G}e 2 up to 15 {T}:
{O}n the route to understand field-induced phase
transitions},
journal = {Physical review / B},
volume = {95},
number = {21},
issn = {2469-9950},
address = {Woodbury, NY},
publisher = {Inst.},
reportid = {FZJ-2017-04594},
pages = {214425},
year = {2017},
abstract = {The features of the magnetic (H,T ) phase diagram of
CeCu2Ge2 are similar to those of superconductingCeCu2Si2,
but the nature of these phases and transitions is still
controversial. For CeCu2Ge2 we present resultson electrical
transport, thermodynamic measurements (magnetization,
magnetostriction), and elastic neutrondiffraction for fields
up to 15 T parallel to the [110] direction. Two magnetic
phases AF1, AF2 and a third,yet unidentified ferrimagnetic
phase AF3 exist below TN = 4.2 K and in fields up to
approximately 26 T. Attemperatures below 2.5 K a first-order
transition from AF1 to AF2 at around 7.8 T was found
experimentally,characterized by a shift of the observed
propagation vector from q1 = (0.285 − 0.285 0.543) to q2 =
(0.34 −0.27 0.55). Above 12.5 T reflections belonging
neither to the AF1 nor to the AF2 type were found. To
interpretthe macroscopic measurements and neutron data a
mean-field simulation with the McPhase program was
carriedout, yielding a low-field double-q magnetic structure
AF1 with q1± = (0.278 ± 0.278 0.556) that jumps toAF2 with
q2± = (0.286 ± 0.286 0.545) at about 5 T (to be compared
to the experimental value of 7.8 T). Thistransition is
followed by a single-q structure AF3 with q3 = (0.28 0.28
0.56) at 10 T (as compared to 12.5 Tfrom experiment) that is
stable up to saturation at 26 T. These calculations also
reveal the principal dependenceof the experimental
magnetization and susceptibility published earlier. The
predicted single-q structure was notdetectable by neutrons
because of limitations in the employed scattering geometry.},
cin = {JCNS (München) ; Jülich Centre for Neutron Science JCNS
(München) ; JCNS-FRM-II / JCNS-2},
ddc = {530},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)JCNS-FRM-II-20110218 /
I:(DE-Juel1)JCNS-2-20110106},
pnm = {6G15 - FRM II / MLZ (POF3-6G15) / 6G4 - Jülich Centre for
Neutron Research (JCNS) (POF3-623)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-6G15 / G:(DE-HGF)POF3-6G4},
experiment = {EXP:(DE-MLZ)PANDA-20140101},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000404463800005},
doi = {10.1103/PhysRevB.95.214425},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/834691},
}