000834788 001__ 834788
000834788 005__ 20240711101520.0
000834788 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.12.002
000834788 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0143-7496
000834788 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1879-0127
000834788 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000428606100001
000834788 037__ $$aFZJ-2017-04679
000834788 041__ $$aEnglish
000834788 082__ $$a530
000834788 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)132718$$aBurdzik, Andrea$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000834788 245__ $$aImpact of reference values used for surface free energy determination: an uncertainty analysis
000834788 260__ $$aNew York, NY [u.a.]$$bElsevier$$c2018
000834788 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000834788 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000834788 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1515048691_1051
000834788 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000834788 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000834788 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000834788 520__ $$aPolar and dispersion surface free energy (SFE) can be determined with the Owens-Wendt method. Thereby, contact angles (CAs) of at least two liquids with known surface tension (ST) components are measured. The ST components can either be determined through experiment or drawn from literature. However, it is important to know how big the difference is between SFE component values that have been calculated with experimentally-determined ST values or values derived from literature. In this study, STs of different test liquids were analyzed by Pendant Drop method and the components by CA measurement on a non-polar surface. CAs on different polymer surfaces were measured to calculate SFE components with the Owens-Wendt method. The calculations conducted were either based on experimentally-determined ST parts or different sets of values found in the literature. The findings of the survey show that, depending on the set of literature values used, the SFE results deviate significantly from the values obtained from experiment. Expressing this deviation in figures, in extreme cases the polar part differs for some polymers by -100% to +100%, with the dispersion component spanning -50% to +43%. In comparison, the expected relative uncertainties exhibited by the experimentally-determined ST values are about 15% for the polar and approximately 5% for the dispersion SFE part. Hence, the results show that the SFE uncertainty can be reduced significantly by means of analyzing the ST parts experimentally.
000834788 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-134$$a134 - Electrolysis and Hydrogen (POF3-134)$$cPOF3-134$$fPOF III$$x0
000834788 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000834788 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129930$$aStähler, Markus$$b1
000834788 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)145276$$aCarmo, Marcelo$$b2
000834788 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129928$$aStolten, Detlef$$b3
000834788 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1484450-3$$a10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.12.002$$gVol. 82, p. 1 - 7$$p1 - 7$$tInternational journal of adhesion and adhesives$$v82$$x0143-7496$$y2018
000834788 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/834788/files/1-s2.0-S014374961730218X-main.pdf$$yRestricted
000834788 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/834788/files/1-s2.0-S014374961730218X-main.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yRestricted
000834788 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/834788/files/1-s2.0-S014374961730218X-main.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yRestricted
000834788 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/834788/files/1-s2.0-S014374961730218X-main.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yRestricted
000834788 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/834788/files/1-s2.0-S014374961730218X-main.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yRestricted
000834788 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/834788/files/1-s2.0-S014374961730218X-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000834788 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:834788$$pVDB
000834788 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)132718$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000834788 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129930$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000834788 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)145276$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000834788 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129928$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
000834788 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-134$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-130$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bEnergie$$lSpeicher und vernetzte Infrastrukturen$$vElectrolysis and Hydrogen$$x0
000834788 9141_ $$y2018
000834788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bINT J ADHES ADHES : 2015
000834788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000834788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000834788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000834788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000834788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000834788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000834788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
000834788 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000834788 920__ $$lyes
000834788 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013$$kIEK-3$$lElektrochemische Verfahrenstechnik$$x0
000834788 980__ $$ajournal
000834788 980__ $$aVDB
000834788 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013
000834788 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000834788 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICE-2-20101013