% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Farrell:835091,
author = {Farrell, Michelle E. and Kennedy, Kristen M. and Rodrigue,
Karen M. and Wig, Gagan and Bischof, Gérard N. and Rieck,
Jennifer R. and Chen, Xi and Festini, Sara B. and Devous,
Michael D. and Park, Denise C.},
title = {{A}ssociation of {L}ongitudinal {C}ognitive {D}ecline
{W}ith {A}myloid {B}urden in {M}iddle-aged and {O}lder
{A}dults},
journal = {JAMA neurology},
volume = {74},
number = {7},
issn = {2168-6149},
address = {Chicago, Ill.},
publisher = {American Medical Association},
reportid = {FZJ-2017-04959},
pages = {830 - 838},
year = {2017},
abstract = {Importance Presently, the clinical standard for reporting
the results of an amyloid positron emission tomography scan
is to assign a dichotomous rating of positive or negative
for the presence of amyloid. In a 4-year longitudinal study,
we investigated whether using a continuous measure of the
magnitude of baseline amyloid burden would provide valuable
information about the rate of future cognitive decline over
the subsequent 4 years compared with a dichotomous measure
in middle-aged and older adults.Objective To examine whether
a continuous, dose-response relationship between amyloid
burden and cognitive decline was present among middle-aged
and older adults.Design, Setting, and Participants This
cohort study included 174 participants from the Dallas
Lifespan Brain Study who were 40 to 89 years old at the
beginning of the study, were cognitively normal at baseline
(a Mini-Mental State Examination score of 26 or higher) with
no history of neurological or psychiatric disorders, and had
completed amyloid imaging ([18F]-florbetapir) at baseline
and cognitive assessments at baseline and a 4-year
follow-up. Continuous amyloid burden was measured as the
mean cortical standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) at
baseline.Main Outcomes and Measures Linear mixed models
assessed the effect of increasing baseline amyloid over time
(SUVR × time interaction) on episodic memory,
reasoning, processing speed, vocabulary, and Mini-Mental
State Examination performance. Age, sex, education,
apolipoprotein ε4, and the random effect of intercepts were
included as covariates.Results The mean (SD) age for all
participants (n = 174) was 66.44 (11.74) years, and 65
participants $(37\%)$ were men. The primary analyses yielded
significant SUVR × time interactions in episodic
memory, processing speed, vocabulary, and Mini-Mental State
Examination performance, but not in reasoning performance.
Higher baseline SUVR projected greater cognitive decline
over 4 years. When controlling for variance related to a
dichotomized positive/negative classification, most effects
on cognition remained. Dichotomized amyloid status alone
yielded fewer significant effects of amyloid on cognitive
decline than continuous SUVR. Among amyloid-positive
participants, increasing baseline SUVR predicted an
increasing decline in episodic memory, but other effects on
cognition were more limited. Finally, higher baseline
amyloid burden among middle-aged adults was related to
changes in vocabulary, with the effect driven by 3
apolipoprotein ε4 homozygotes.Conclusions and Relevance
These results suggest that the magnitude of amyloid burden
at baseline is associated with the rate of cognitive decline
over 4 years and potentially provides important information
about the rate of future cognitive decline that is not
available from a dichotomous positive/negative
categorization.},
cin = {INM-3},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
pnm = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000405077100015},
pubmed = {pmid:28558099},
doi = {10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.0892},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/835091},
}