guest ::
| Home > Publications database > Spatial controls of topsoil and subsoil organic carbon turnover under C$_{3}$ –C$_{4}$ vegetation change > print |
| Home > Publications database > Spatial controls of topsoil and subsoil organic carbon turnover under C$_{3}$ –C$_{4}$ vegetation change > print |
| 001 | 836057 | ||
| 005 | 20210129230854.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.05.006 |2 doi |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 0016-7061 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 1872-6259 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a WOS:000404496200006 |2 WOS |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a FZJ-2017-05181 |
| 041 | _ | _ | |a English |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 550 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Schiedung, H. |0 P:(DE-Juel1)165137 |b 0 |e Corresponding author |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Spatial controls of topsoil and subsoil organic carbon turnover under C$_{3}$ –C$_{4}$ vegetation change |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a Amsterdam [u.a.] |c 2017 |b Elsevier Science |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1501487025_31605 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a Soil organic carbon (SOC) is often heterogeneously distributed in arable fields and so is probably its turnover. We hypothesized that the spatial patterns of SOC turnover are controlled by basic soil properties like soil texture and the amount of rock fragments. To test this hypothesis, we cultivated maize as a C4 plant on a heterogeneous arable field (155 × 60 m) that had formerly been solely cultivated with C3 crops, and monitored the incorporation of isotopically heavier maize-derived C into SOC by stable 13C isotope analyses. To obtain a homogeneous input of C4 biomass into the C3 soil across the field, we chopped the aboveground maize biomass after harvest in autumn and re-spread it uniformly over the field. Subsequently, the soil was grubbed and then ploughed in the next spring. In addition, we assessed the spatial patterns of SOC stocks, amount of rock fragments and texture, as well as potential soil organic matter (SOM) degradability by ex-situ soil respiration measurements. Heterogeneity of maize growth was monitored as a covariate using laser scanning and satellite images. After two years, maize C had substituted 7.4 ± 3.2% of SOC in the topsoil (0–30 cm) and 2.9 ± 1.7% of SOC in the subsoil (30–50 cm). Assuming that monoexponential decay mainly drove this SOC substitution, this resulted in mean residence times (MRT) of SOC in the range of 30 ± 12 years for the topsoil and of 87 ± 45 years for the subsoil, respectively. Variation in topsoil MRT was related to potential CO2 release during soil incubation (R2 = 0.51), but not to basic soil properties. In the subsoil, in contrast, the variation of maize C incorporation into the SOC pool was controlled by variations in maize yield (R2 = 0.44), which also exhibited a pronounced spatial variability (0.84 to 1.94 kg dry biomass m−2), and which was negatively correlated with the amount of rock fragments (R2 = 0.48, p < 0.001). We assume that heterogeneous input of belowground root biomass blurs the causal interactions between the spatial heterogeneity of soil properties and the related patterns of SOC turnover, and conclude that spatial patterns of SOC turnover are not easily predictable by standard soil analyses. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255 |c POF3-255 |f POF III |x 0 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Tilly, N. |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 1 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Hütt, C. |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 2 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Welp, G. |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 3 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Brüggemann, N. |0 P:(DE-Juel1)142357 |b 4 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Amelung, W. |0 P:(DE-Juel1)129427 |b 5 |
| 773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.05.006 |g Vol. 303, p. 44 - 51 |0 PERI:(DE-600)2001729-7 |p 44 - 51 |t Geoderma |v 303 |y 2017 |x 0016-7061 |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/836057/files/1-s2.0-S0016706116308886-main.pdf |y Restricted |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/836057/files/1-s2.0-S0016706116308886-main.gif?subformat=icon |x icon |y Restricted |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/836057/files/1-s2.0-S0016706116308886-main.jpg?subformat=icon-1440 |x icon-1440 |y Restricted |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/836057/files/1-s2.0-S0016706116308886-main.jpg?subformat=icon-180 |x icon-180 |y Restricted |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/836057/files/1-s2.0-S0016706116308886-main.jpg?subformat=icon-640 |x icon-640 |y Restricted |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/836057/files/1-s2.0-S0016706116308886-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa |x pdfa |y Restricted |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:836057 |p VDB |p VDB:Earth_Environment |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 0 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)165137 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 4 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)142357 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 5 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)129427 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |l Terrestrische Umwelt |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200 |v Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction |x 0 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3 |b Erde und Umwelt |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2017 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Nationallizenz |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310 |2 StatID |b NCBI Molecular Biology Database |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b GEODERMA : 2015 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600 |2 StatID |b Ebsco Academic Search |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b ASC |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050 |2 StatID |b BIOSIS Previews |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a IF < 5 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900 |2 StatID |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118 |k IBG-3 |l Agrosphäre |x 0 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|