% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Geiger:836148,
      author       = {Geiger, Alexander and Niessen, Eva and Bente, Gary and
                      Vogeley, Kai},
      title        = {{E}yes versus hands: {H}ow perceived stimuli influence
                      motor actions},
      journal      = {PLoS one},
      volume       = {12},
      number       = {7},
      issn         = {1932-6203},
      address      = {Lawrence, Kan.},
      publisher    = {PLoS},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2017-05271},
      pages        = {e0180780 -},
      year         = {2017},
      abstract     = {Many studies showed that biological (e.g., gaze-shifts or
                      hand movements) and non-biological stimuli (e.g., arrows or
                      moving points) redirect attention. Biological stimuli seem
                      to be more suitable than non-biological to perform this
                      task. However, the question remains if biological stimuli do
                      have different influences on redirecting attention and if
                      this property is dependent on how we react to those stimuli.
                      In two separate experiments, participants interact either
                      with a biological or a non-biological stimulus (experiment
                      1), or with two biological stimuli (gaze-shifts, hand
                      movements)(experiment 2) to which they responded with two
                      different actions (saccade, button press), either in a
                      congruent or incongruent manner. Results from experiment 1
                      suggest that interacting with the biological stimulus lead
                      to faster responses, compared to the non-biological
                      stimulus, independent of the response type. Results from
                      experiment 2 show longer reaction times when the depicted
                      stimulus was not matching the response type (e.g., reacting
                      with hand movements to a moving object or gaze-shift)
                      compared to a matching condition, while especially the
                      gaze-following condition (reacting with a gaze shift to a
                      perceived gaze shift) led to the fastest responses. These
                      results suggest that redirecting attention is not only
                      dependent on the perceived stimulus but also on the way how
                      those stimuli are responded to.},
      cin          = {INM-3},
      ddc          = {500},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000406371800019},
      pubmed       = {pmid:28746352},
      doi          = {10.1371/journal.pone.0180780},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/836148},
}