001     8362
005     20180208212837.0
024 7 _ |2 pmid
|a pmid:19576789
024 7 _ |2 DOI
|a 10.1016/j.plaphy.2009.06.002
024 7 _ |2 WOS
|a WOS:000269586400011
037 _ _ |a PreJuSER-8362
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 630
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Plant Sciences
100 1 _ |a Greer, D.H.
|b 0
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
245 _ _ |a Leaf photosynthetic and solar-tracking responses of mallow, Malva parviflora, to photon flux density
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|b Elsevier Science
|c 2009
300 _ _ |a 946 - 953
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
440 _ 0 |a Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
|x 0981-9428
|0 22002
|y 10
|v 47
500 _ _ |a We thank Wayne Scott for technical assistance for this project. The study was also technically supported by Evert Van Thoor while on an Internship from Wageningen University and Research Centre for a Masters degree in Agricultural Engineering. We also thank SAS Australia for their generous support to the senior author for supplying software.
520 _ _ |a Malva parviflora L. (mallow) is a species that occupies high-light habitats as a weedy invader in orchards and vineyards. Species of the Malvaceae are known to solar track and anecdotal evidence suggests this species may also. How M. parviflora responds physiologically to light in comparison with other species within the Malvaceae remains unknown. Tracking and photosynthetic responses to photon flux density (PFD) were evaluated on plants grown in greenhouse conditions. Tracking ability was assessed in the growth conditions and by exposing leaves to specific light intensities and measuring changes in the angle of the leaf plane. Light responses were also determined by photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence. Leaves followed a heliotropic response which was highly PFD-dependent, with tracking rates increasing in a curvilinear pattern. Maximum tracking rates were up to 20 degrees h(-1) and saturated for light above 1,300 micromol (photons) m(-2) s(-1). This high-light saturation, both for tracking (much higher than the other species), and for photosynthesis, confirmed mallow as a high-light demanding species. Further, because there was no photoinhibition, the leaves could capture the potential of an increased carbon gain in higher irradiance by resorting to solar tracking. Modelling suggested the tracking response could increase the annual carbon gain by as much as 25% compared with leaves that do not track the sun. The various leaf attributes associated with solar tracking, therefore, help to account for the success of this species as a weed in many locations worldwide.
536 _ _ |a Terrestrische Umwelt
|c P24
|2 G:(DE-HGF)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to Web of Science, Pubmed
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Carbon: metabolism
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Chlorophyll: chemistry
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Chlorophyll: metabolism
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Ecosystem
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Fluorescence
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Malva: metabolism
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Malva: physiology
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Models, Biological
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Photons
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Photosynthesis: radiation effects
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Plant Leaves: metabolism
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Plant Leaves: physiology
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Seasons
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Sunlight
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Time Factors
650 _ 7 |0 1406-65-1
|2 NLM Chemicals
|a Chlorophyll
650 _ 7 |0 7440-44-0
|2 NLM Chemicals
|a Carbon
650 _ 7 |a J
|2 WoSType
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Malva parviflora
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Carbon gain
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Chlorophyll fluorescence
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Light response
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Leaf angle
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Photosynthesis
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Sun tracking
700 1 _ |a Thorpe, M.R.
|b 1
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB67249
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.plaphy.2009.06.002
|g Vol. 47, p. 946 - 953
|p 946 - 953
|q 47<946 - 953
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2031431-0
|t Plant physiology and biochemistry
|v 47
|y 2009
|x 0981-9428
856 7 _ |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2009.06.002
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:8362
|p VDB
913 1 _ |k P24
|v Terrestrische Umwelt
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|b Erde und Umwelt
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|x 0
914 1 _ |a Nachtrag
|y 2009
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
920 1 _ |k ICG-3
|l Phytosphäre
|d 31.10.2010
|g ICG
|0 I:(DE-Juel1)ICG-3-20090406
|x 1
970 _ _ |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)117274
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a ConvertedRecord
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICG-3-20090406


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21