% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Wu:836750,
author = {Wu, Di and Cárdenas, Laura M. and Calvet, Salvador and
Brüggemann, Nicolas and Loick, Nadine and Liu, Shurong and
Bol, Roland},
title = {{T}he effect of nitrification inhibitor on {N} 2 {O}, {NO}
and {N} 2 emissions under different soil moisture levels in
a permanent grassland soil},
journal = {Soil biology $\&$ biochemistry},
volume = {113},
issn = {0038-0717},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {FZJ-2017-05803},
pages = {153 - 160},
year = {2017},
abstract = {Emissions of gaseous forms of nitrogen from soil, such as
nitrous oxide (N2O) and nitric oxide (NO), have shown great
impact on global warming and atmospheric chemistry. Although
in soil both nitrification and denitrification could cause
N2O and NO emissions, most studies demonstrated that
denitrification is the dominant process responsible for the
increase of atmospheric N2O, while nitrification produces
mostly NO. The use of nitrification inhibitors (NIs) has
repeatedly been shown to reduce both N2O and NO emissions
from agricultural soils; nevertheless, the efficiency of the
mitigation effect varies greatly. It is generally assumed
that nitrification inhibitors have no direct effect on
denitrification. However, the indirect impact, due to the
reduced substrate (nitrate) delivery to microsites where
denitrification occurs, may have significant effects on
denitrification product stoichiometry that may significantly
lower soil-borne N2O emissions. Soil-water status is
considered to have a remarkable effect on the relative
fluxes of nitrogen gases. The effect and mechanism of NI on
N2O, NO and N2 emission under different soil water-filled
pore space (WFPS) is still not well explored. In the present
study, we conducted a soil incubation experiment in an
automated continuous-flow incubation system under a He/O2
atmosphere. Ammonium sulfate was applied with and without NI
(DMPP) to a permanent UK grassland soil under three
different soil moisture conditions (50, 65, and $80\%$
WFPS). With every treatment, glucose was applied to supply
enough available carbon for denitrification. Emissions of
CO2, N2O, NO and N2 were investigated. Additionally,
isotopic signatures of soil-emitted N2O were analyzed.
Generally, higher WFPS led to higher N2O and NO emissions,
while N2 emissions were only detected at high soil moisture
condition $(80\%$ WFPS). Different processes were
responsible for N2O and NO emission in different phases of
the incubation period. The application of DMPP did
significantly reduce both N2O and NO emissions at all three
soil moisture conditions. Furthermore, DMPP application
increased N2 emissions and decreased the N2O/(N2O + N2)
product ratio at $80\%$ WFPS.},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {570},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
(POF3-255)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000407536200017},
doi = {10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.06.007},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/836750},
}