% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Federici:836773,
author = {Federici, G. and Biel, W. and Gilbert, M. R. and Kemp, R.
and Taylor, N. and Wenninger, R.},
title = {{E}uropean {DEMO} design strategy and consequences for
materials},
journal = {Nuclear fusion},
volume = {57},
number = {9},
issn = {1741-4326},
address = {Vienna},
publisher = {IAEA},
reportid = {FZJ-2017-05824},
pages = {092002 -},
year = {2017},
abstract = {Demonstrating the production of net electricity and
operating with a closed fuel-cycle remain unarguably the
crucial steps towards the exploitation of fusion power.
These are the aims of a demonstration fusion reactor (DEMO)
proposed to be built after ITER. This paper briefly
describes the DEMO design options that are being considered
in Europe for the current conceptual design studies as part
of the Roadmap to Fusion Electricity Horizon 2020. These are
not intended to represent fixed and exclusive design choices
but rather 'proxies' of possible plant design options to be
used to identify generic design/material issues that need to
be resolved in future fusion reactor systems. The materials
nuclear design requirements and the effects of radiation
damage are briefly analysed with emphasis on a pulsed 'low
extrapolation' system, which is being used for the initial
design integration studies, based as far as possible on
mature technologies and reliable regimes of operation (to be
extrapolated from the ITER experience), and on the use of
materials suitable for the expected level of neutron
fluence. The main technical issues arising from the plasma
and nuclear loads and the effects of radiation damage
particularly on the structural and heat sink materials of
the vessel and in-vessel components are critically
discussed. The need to establish realistic target
performance and a development schedule for near-term
electricity production tends to favour more conservative
technology choices. The readiness of the technical (physics
and technology) assumptions that are being made is expected
to be an important factor for the selection of the technical
features of the device.},
cin = {IEK-4},
ddc = {530},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-4-20101013},
pnm = {174 - Plasma-Wall-Interaction (POF3-174)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-174},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000407854600002},
doi = {10.1088/1741-4326/57/9/092002},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/836773},
}