% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Wenninger:837022,
      author       = {Wenninger, R. and Kembleton, R. and Biel, W. and
                      Bolzonella, T. and Ciattaglia, S. and Cismondi, F. and
                      Coleman, M. and Donné, A. J. H. and Eich, T. and Fable, E.
                      and Federici, G. and Franke, T. and Lux, H. and Maviglia, F.
                      and Pütterich, T. and Saarelma, S. and Snickers, A. and
                      Villone, F. and Vincenzi, P. and Wolff, D. and Zohm, H. and
                      Bachmann, C. and Meszaros, B.},
      title        = {{T}he physics and technology basis entering {E}uropean
                      system code studies for {DEMO}},
      journal      = {Nuclear fusion},
      volume       = {57},
      number       = {1},
      issn         = {1741-4326},
      address      = {Vienna},
      publisher    = {IAEA},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2017-06038},
      pages        = {016011},
      year         = {2017},
      abstract     = {A large scale program to develop a conceptual design for a
                      demonstration fusion power plant (DEMO) has been initiated
                      in Europe. Central elements are the baseline design points,
                      which are developed by system codes. The assessment of the
                      credibility of these design points is often hampered by
                      missing information. The main physics and technology content
                      of the central European system codes have been published
                      (Kovari et al 2014 Fusion Eng. Des. 89 3054–69, 2016
                      Fusion Eng. Des. 104 9–20, Reux et al 2015 Nucl. Fusion 55
                      073011). In addition, this publication discusses key input
                      parameters for the pulsed and conservative design option
                      $\tt{EU\ DEMO1\ 2015}$ and provides justifications for the
                      parameter choices. In this context several DEMO physics gaps
                      are identified, which need to be addressed in the future to
                      reduce the uncertainty in predicting the performance of the
                      device.Also the sensitivities of net electric power and
                      pulse duration to variations of the input parameters are
                      investigated. The most extreme sensitivity is found for the
                      elongation ($ \Delta {{\kappa}_{95}}=10 \\% $ corresponds to
                      $ \Delta {{P}_{\text{el},\text{net}}}=125 \\% $ ).},
      cin          = {IEK-4},
      ddc          = {530},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-4-20101013},
      pnm          = {174 - Plasma-Wall-Interaction (POF3-174)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-174},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000386126700003},
      doi          = {10.1088/0029-5515/57/1/016011},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/837022},
}