000837561 001__ 837561
000837561 005__ 20210129231354.0
000837561 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1007/s00468-017-1537-3
000837561 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0931-1890
000837561 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1432-2285
000837561 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000405685800007
000837561 037__ $$aFZJ-2017-06449
000837561 082__ $$a580
000837561 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHu, Bin$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000837561 245__ $$aNitrogen nutrition of native and introduced forest tree species in N-limited ecosystems of the Qinling Mountains, China
000837561 260__ $$aBerlin$$bSpringer$$c2017
000837561 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000837561 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000837561 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1504856032_17820
000837561 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000837561 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000837561 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000837561 520__ $$aNitrogen availability and uptake capacity are key factors influencing forest growth and development in N-limited terrestrial ecosystems. With the aim to determine how species and forest management affect tree N nutrition, we conducted root N uptake experiments as well as soil N analyses at three forest stands with different native and introduced tree species (i.e. Larix principis-rupprechtii Mayr., Quercus aliena var. acutiserrata Maxim. ex Wenz. and Picea wilsonii Mast.) and two management approaches (i.e. monoculture versus mixed stand) in the Qinling Mountains of China. Across the native and introduced species studied, in general, investigated trees take up both, organic and inorganic N compounds, but prefer organic N (Gln- and Arg-) over inorganic NH4+–N. The introduced conifer species (L. principis-ruprechtii) showed higher root N acquisition capacities compared to a native conifer species (P. wilsonii) under N-limited conditions. Moreover, the mixed forest stand with L. principis-ruprechtii and Q. alinea var. acutesserata accumulated more nitrogen in soil pools and showed improved C and N retention capability through the whole soil profile as compared to the monocultures of P. wilsonii or L. principis-ruprechtii. Similar acquisition strategies were observed for specific N sources (i.e. organic versus inorganic) across all investigated tree species. Still the introduced species Larix exhibited a superior root N acquisition capacity and, therefore, may be a good candidate for afforestation programs in the studied region. The present results underpin the significance of forest management practices that achieve a mixed species structure with broadleaved tree species such as Quercus for restoration of soil C and N pools in order to stabilize forest ecosystems and to achieve sustainable forest development.
000837561 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$a255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)$$cPOF3-255$$fPOF III$$x0
000837561 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000837561 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)166012$$aZhou, Minghua$$b1
000837561 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBilela, Silvija$$b2
000837561 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSimon, Judy$$b3
000837561 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDannenmann, Michael$$b4
000837561 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLiu, Xiping$$b5
000837561 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aAlfarraj, Saleh$$b6
000837561 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHou, Lin$$b7
000837561 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aChen, Hui$$b8
000837561 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aZhang, Shuoxin$$b9
000837561 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aButterbach-Bahl, Klaus$$b10
000837561 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aRennenberg, Heinz$$b11
000837561 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1463920-8$$a10.1007/s00468-017-1537-3$$gVol. 31, no. 4, p. 1189 - 1202$$n4$$p1189 - 1202$$tTrees$$v31$$x1432-2285$$y2017
000837561 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:837561$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pVDB
000837561 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)166012$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000837561 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x0
000837561 9141_ $$y2017
000837561 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000837561 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000837561 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000837561 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bTREES-STRUCT FUNCT : 2015
000837561 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000837561 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000837561 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000837561 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000837561 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000837561 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000837561 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000837561 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000837561 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000837561 980__ $$ajournal
000837561 980__ $$aVDB
000837561 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000837561 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED