001     837563
005     20210129231355.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1175/JHM-D-16-0159.1
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1525-7541
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1525-755X
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/15271
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000405926000016
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a altmetric:17397770
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2017-06451
082 _ _ |a 550
100 1 _ |a Sulis, Mauro
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Coupling Groundwater, Vegetation, and Atmospheric Processes: A Comparison of Two Integrated Models
260 _ _ |a Boston, Mass.
|c 2017
|b AMS
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1580284359_28137
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a This study compares two modeling platforms, ParFlow.WRF (PF.WRF) and the Terrestrial Systems Modeling Platform (TerrSysMP), with a common 3D integrated surface–groundwater model to examine the variability in simulated soil–vegetation–atmosphere interactions. Idealized and hindcast simulations over the North Rhine–Westphalia region in western Germany for clear-sky conditions and strong convective precipitation using both modeling platforms are presented. Idealized simulations highlight the strong variability introduced by the difference in land surface parameterizations (e.g., ground evaporation and canopy transpiration) and atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) schemes on the simulated land–atmosphere interactions. Results of the idealized simulations also suggest a different range of sensitivity in the two models of land surface and atmospheric parameterizations to water-table depth fluctuations. For hindcast simulations, both modeling platforms simulate net radiation and cumulative precipitation close to observed station data, while larger differences emerge between spatial patterns of soil moisture and convective rainfall due to the difference in the physical parameterization of the land surface and atmospheric component. This produces a different feedback by the hydrological model in the two platforms in terms of discharge over different catchments in the study area. Finally, an analysis of land surface and ABL heat and moisture budgets using the mixing diagram approach reveals different sensitivities of diurnal atmospheric processes to the groundwater parameterizations in both modeling platforms.
536 _ _ |a 255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|c POF3-255
|f POF III
|x 0
536 _ _ |a Evaluating the influence of subsurface hydrodynamics on atmospheric processes (hbn33_20150501)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)hbn33_20150501
|c hbn33_20150501
|f Evaluating the influence of subsurface hydrodynamics on atmospheric processes
|x 1
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Williams, John L.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Shrestha, Prabhakar
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Diederich, Malte
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Simmer, Clemens
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Kollet, Stefan
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)151405
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Maxwell, Reed M.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
773 _ _ |a 10.1175/JHM-D-16-0159.1
|g Vol. 18, no. 5, p. 1489 - 1511
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2042176-X
|n 5
|p 1489 - 1511
|t Journal of hydrometeorology
|v 18
|y 2017
|x 1525-7541
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/837563/files/jhm-d-16-0159.1.pdf
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/837563/files/jhm-d-16-0159.1.gif?subformat=icon
|x icon
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/837563/files/jhm-d-16-0159.1.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
|x icon-1440
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/837563/files/jhm-d-16-0159.1.jpg?subformat=icon-180
|x icon-180
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/837563/files/jhm-d-16-0159.1.jpg?subformat=icon-640
|x icon-640
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/837563/files/jhm-d-16-0159.1.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:837563
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p driver
|p VDB:Earth_Environment
|p VDB
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)151405
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200
|v Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Erde und Umwelt
914 1 _ |y 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b J HYDROMETEOROL : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
|k IBG-3
|l Agrosphäre
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)NIC-20090406
|k NIC
|l John von Neumann - Institut für Computing
|x 1
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)NIC-20090406
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21