000837564 001__ 837564
000837564 005__ 20210129231355.0
000837564 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.2134/jeq2017.03.0117
000837564 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0047-2425
000837564 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1537-2537
000837564 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:28991980
000837564 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000411433900022
000837564 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:26148923
000837564 037__ $$aFZJ-2017-06452
000837564 041__ $$aEnglish
000837564 082__ $$a333.7
000837564 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aVan Nguyen, Quan$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000837564 245__ $$aBiogas Digester Hydraulic Retention Time Affects Oxygen Consumption Patterns and Greenhouse Gas Emissions after Application of Digestate to Soil
000837564 260__ $$aMadison, Wis.$$bASA [u.a.]$$c2017
000837564 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000837564 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000837564 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1507110794_26432
000837564 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000837564 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000837564 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000837564 520__ $$aKnowledge about environmental impacts associated with the application of anaerobic digestion residue to agricultural land is of interest owing to the rapid proliferation of biogas plants worldwide. However, virtually no information exists concerning how soil-emitted N2O is affected by the feedstock hydraulic retention time (HRT) in the biogas digester. Here, the O2 planar optode technique was used to visualize soil O2 dynamics following the surface application of digestates of the codigestion of pig slurry and agro-industrial waste. We also used N2O isotopomer analysis of soil-emitted N2O to determine the N2O production pathways, i.e., nitrification or denitrification. Two-dimensional images of soil O2 indicated that anoxic and hypoxic conditions developed at 2.0- and 1.5-cm soil depth for soil amended with the digestate produced with 15-d (PO15) and 30-d (PO30) retention time, respectively. Total N2O emissions were significantly lower for PO15 than PO30 due to the greater expansion of the anoxic zone, which enhanced N2O reduction via complete denitrification. However, cumulative CO2 emissions were not significantly different between PO15 and PO30 for the entire incubation period. During incubation, N2O emissions came from both nitrification and denitrification in amended soils. Increasing the HRT of the biogas digester appears to induce significant N2O emissions, but it is unlikely to affect the N2O production pathways after application to soil.
000837564 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$a255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)$$cPOF3-255$$fPOF III$$x0
000837564 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000837564 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aJensen, Lars Stoumann$$b1
000837564 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)145865$$aBol, Roland$$b2
000837564 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aWu, Di$$b3
000837564 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aTriolo, Jin Mi$$b4
000837564 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aVazifehkhoran, Ali Heidarzadeh$$b5
000837564 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBruun, Sander$$b6
000837564 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2050469-X$$a10.2134/jeq2017.03.0117$$gVol. 0, no. 0, p. 0 -$$n5$$p1114-1122$$tJournal of environmental quality$$v46$$x0047-2425$$y2017
000837564 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/837564/files/jeq-46-5-1114.pdf$$yRestricted
000837564 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/837564/files/jeq-46-5-1114.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yRestricted
000837564 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/837564/files/jeq-46-5-1114.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yRestricted
000837564 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/837564/files/jeq-46-5-1114.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yRestricted
000837564 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/837564/files/jeq-46-5-1114.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yRestricted
000837564 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/837564/files/jeq-46-5-1114.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000837564 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:837564$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pVDB
000837564 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)145865$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000837564 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x0
000837564 9141_ $$y2017
000837564 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000837564 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000837564 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bJ ENVIRON QUAL : 2015
000837564 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000837564 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000837564 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000837564 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000837564 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000837564 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000837564 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000837564 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000837564 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000837564 980__ $$ajournal
000837564 980__ $$aVDB
000837564 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000837564 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED