% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Plschke:837640,
author = {Pläschke, Rachel N. and Cieslik, Edna and Müller,
Veronika and Hoffstaedter, Felix and Plachti, Anna and
Varikuti, Deepthi and Goosses, Mareike and Latz, Anne and
Caspers, Svenja and Jockwitz, Christiane and Moebus, Susanne
and Gruber, Oliver and Eickhoff, Claudia R. and Reetz,
Kathrin and Heller, Julia and Südmeyer, Martin and Mathys,
Christian and Caspers, Julian and Grefkes, Christian and
Kalenscher, Tobias and Langner, Robert and Eickhoff, Simon},
title = {{O}n the integrity of functional brain networks in
schizophrenia, {P}arkinson's disease, and advanced age:
{E}vidence from connectivity-based single-subject
classification},
journal = {Human brain mapping},
volume = {38},
number = {12},
issn = {1065-9471},
address = {New York, NY},
publisher = {Wiley-Liss},
reportid = {FZJ-2017-06518},
pages = {5845–5858},
year = {2017},
abstract = {Previous whole-brain functional connectivity studies
achieved successful classifications of patients and healthy
controls but only offered limited specificity as to affected
brain systems. Here, we examined whether the connectivity
patterns of functional systems affected in schizophrenia
(SCZ), Parkinson's disease (PD), or normal aging equally
translate into high classification accuracies for these
conditions. We compared classification performance between
pre-defined networks for each group and, for any given
network, between groups. Separate support vector machine
classifications of 86 SCZ patients, 80 PD patients, and 95
older adults relative to their matched healthy/young
controls, respectively, were performed on functional
connectivity in 12 task-based, meta-analytically defined
networks using 25 replications of a nested 10-fold
cross-validation scheme. Classification performance of the
various networks clearly differed between conditions, as
those networks that best classified one disease were usually
non-informative for the other. For SCZ, but not PD,
emotion-processing, empathy, and cognitive action control
networks distinguished patients most accurately from
controls. For PD, but not SCZ, networks subserving
autobiographical or semantic memory, motor execution, and
theory-of-mind cognition yielded the best classifications.
In contrast, young–old classification was excellent based
on all networks and outperformed both clinical
classifications. Our pattern-classification approach
captured associations between clinical and developmental
conditions and functional network integrity with a higher
level of specificity than did previous whole-brain analyses.
Taken together, our results support resting-state
connectivity as a marker of functional dysregulation in
specific networks known to be affected by SCZ and PD, while
suggesting that aging affects network integrity in a more
global way.},
cin = {INM-7 / INM-11 / INM-1 / INM-3},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)INM-11-20170113 /
I:(DE-Juel1)INM-1-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
pnm = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:28876500},
UT = {WOS:000414683400002},
doi = {10.1002/hbm.23763},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/837640},
}