000837848 001__ 837848
000837848 005__ 20210129231434.0
000837848 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.09.001
000837848 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0301-0511
000837848 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1873-6246
000837848 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:28899747
000837848 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000416436800028
000837848 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:25034127
000837848 037__ $$aFZJ-2017-06625
000837848 041__ $$aEnglish
000837848 082__ $$a370
000837848 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aPergola, Giulio$$b0
000837848 245__ $$aA neural signature of food semantics is associated with body-mass index
000837848 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier Science$$c2017
000837848 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000837848 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000837848 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1507111013_26433
000837848 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000837848 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000837848 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000837848 520__ $$aVisual recognition of objects may rely on different features depending on the category to which they belong. Recognizing natural objects, such as fruits and plants, weighs more on their perceptual attributes, whereas recognizing man-made objects, such as tools or vehicles, weighs more upon the functions and actions they enable. Edible objects are perceptually rich but also prepared for specific functions, therefore it is unclear how perceptual and functional attributes affect their recognition.Two event-related potentials experiments investigated: (i) whether food categorization in the brain is differentially modulated by sensory and functional attributes, depending on whether the food is natural or transformed; (ii) whether these processes are modulated by participants’ body mass index. In experiment 1, healthy normal-weight participants were presented with a sentence (prime) and a photograph of a food. Primes described either a sensory feature (‘It tastes sweet’) or a functional feature (‘It is suitable for a wedding party’) of the food, while photographs depicted either a natural (e.g., cherry) or a transformed food (e.g., pizza). Prime-feature pairs were either congruent or incongruent. This design aimed at modulating N400-like components elicited by semantic processing. In experiment 1, N400-like amplitude was significantly larger for transformed food than for natural food with sensory primes, and vice versa with functional primes. In experiment 2, underweight and obese women performed the same semantic task. We found that, while the N400-like component in obese participants was modulated by sensory-functional primes only for transformed food, the same modulation was found in underweight participants only for natural food. These findings suggest that the level of food transformation interacts with participants’ body mass index in modulating food perception and the underlying brain processing.
000837848 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572$$a572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)$$cPOF3-572$$fPOF III$$x0
000837848 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000837848 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aForoni, Francesco$$b1
000837848 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)166200$$aMengotti, Paola$$b2
000837848 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aArgiris, Georgette$$b3
000837848 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aRumiati, Raffaella Ida$$b4$$eCorresponding author
000837848 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1496494-6$$a10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.09.001$$gp. S0301051117302302$$n-$$p282-292$$tBiological psychology$$v129$$x0301-0511$$y2017
000837848 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/837848/files/1-s2.0-S0301051117302302-main.pdf$$yRestricted
000837848 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/837848/files/1-s2.0-S0301051117302302-main.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yRestricted
000837848 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/837848/files/1-s2.0-S0301051117302302-main.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yRestricted
000837848 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/837848/files/1-s2.0-S0301051117302302-main.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yRestricted
000837848 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/837848/files/1-s2.0-S0301051117302302-main.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yRestricted
000837848 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/837848/files/1-s2.0-S0301051117302302-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000837848 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:837848$$pVDB
000837848 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000837848 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000837848 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000837848 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bBIOL PSYCHOL : 2015
000837848 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000837848 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000837848 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000837848 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000837848 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000837848 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000837848 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000837848 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0130$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSocial Sciences Citation Index
000837848 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1180$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences
000837848 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000837848 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000837848 9141_ $$y2017
000837848 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)166200$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000837848 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lDecoding the Human Brain$$v(Dys-)function and Plasticity$$x0
000837848 920__ $$lyes
000837848 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406$$kINM-3$$lKognitive Neurowissenschaften$$x0
000837848 980__ $$ajournal
000837848 980__ $$aVDB
000837848 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
000837848 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED