% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Tang:837953,
author = {Tang, Q. and Kurtz, W. and Schilling, O. S. and Brunner, P.
and Vereecken, H. and Hendricks-Franssen, Harrie-Jan},
title = {{T}he influence of riverbed heterogeneity patterns on
river-aquifer exchange fluxes under different connection
regimes},
journal = {Journal of hydrology},
volume = {554},
issn = {0022-1694},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier},
reportid = {FZJ-2017-06714},
pages = {383-396},
year = {2017},
abstract = {Riverbed hydraulic conductivity (K) is a critical parameter
for the prediction of exchange fluxes between a river and an
aquifer. In this study, the role of heterogeneity patterns
was explored using the fully integrated hydrological model
HydroGeoSphere simulating complex, variably saturated
subsurface flow. A synthetic 3-D river-aquifer reference
model was constructed with a heterogeneous riverbed using
non-multi-Gaussian patterns in the form of meandering
channels. Data assimilation was used to test the ability of
different riverbed K patterns to reproduce hydraulic heads,
riverbed K and river-aquifer exchange fluxes. Both fully
saturated as well as variably saturated conditions
underneath the riverbed were tested. The data assimilation
experiments with the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) were
carried out for four types of geostatistical models of
riverbed K fields: (i) spatially homogeneous, (ii)
heterogeneous with multi-Gaussian distribution, (iii)
heterogeneous with non-multi-Gaussian distribution
(channelized structures) and (iv) heterogeneous with
non-multi-Gaussian distribution (elliptic structures). For
all data assimilation experiments, state variables and
riverbed K were updated by assimilating hydraulic heads. For
saturated conditions, heterogeneous geostatistical models
allowed a better characterization of net exchange fluxes
than a homogeneous approximation. Among the three
heterogeneous models, the performance of non-multi-Gaussian
models was superior to the performance of the multi-Gaussian
model, but the two tested non-multi-Gaussian models showed
only small differences in performance from one another. For
the variably saturated conditions both the multi-Gaussian
model and the homogeneous model performed clearly worse than
the two non-multi-Gaussian models. The two
non-multi-Gaussian models did not show much difference in
performance. This clearly shows that characterizing
heterogeneity of riverbed K is important. Moreover,
particularly under variably saturated flow conditions the
mean and the variance of riverbed K do not provide enough
information for exchange flux characterization and
additional histogram information of riverbed K provides
crucial information for the reproduction of exchange
fluxes.},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {690},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
(POF3-255)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000415769600028},
doi = {10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.09.031},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/837953},
}