% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Rajkumar:838009,
author = {Rajkumar, Ravichandran and Rota Kops, Elena and Mauler,
Jörg and Tellmann, Lutz and Lerche, Christoph and Herzog,
Hans and Shah, N. J. and Neuner, Irene},
title = {{S}imultaneous trimodal {PET}-{MR}-{EEG} imaging: {D}o
{EEG} caps generate artefacts in {PET} images?},
journal = {PLoS one},
volume = {12},
number = {9},
issn = {1932-6203},
address = {Lawrence, Kan.},
publisher = {PLoS},
reportid = {FZJ-2017-06757},
pages = {e0184743 -},
year = {2017},
abstract = {Trimodal simultaneous acquisition of positron emission
tomography (PET), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and
electroencephalography (EEG) has become feasible due to the
development of hybrid PET-MR scanners. To capture the
temporal dynamics of neuronal activation on a
millisecond-by-millisecond basis, an EEG system is appended
to the quantitative high resolution PET-MR imaging modality
already established in our institute. One of the major
difficulties associated with the development of simultaneous
trimodal acquisition is that the components traditionally
used in each modality can cause interferences in its
counterpart. The mutual interferences of MRI components and
PET components on PET and MR images, and the influence of
EEG electrodes on functional MRI images have been studied
and reported on. Building on this, this study aims to
investigate the influence of the EEG cap on the quality and
quantification of PET images acquired during simultaneous
PET-MR measurements. A preliminary transmission scan study
on the ECAT HR+ scanner, using an Iida phantom, showed
visible attenuation effect due to the EEG cap. The
BrainPET-MR emission images of the Iida phantom with
[18F]Fluordeoxyglucose, as well as of human subjects with
the EEG cap, did not show significant effects of the EEG
cap, even though the applied attenuation correction did not
take into account the attenuation of the EEG cap itself.},
cin = {INM-4 / INM-11 / JARA-BRAIN},
ddc = {500},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)INM-11-20170113 /
$I:(DE-82)080010_20140620$},
pnm = {573 - Neuroimaging (POF3-573)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-573},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000410669200058},
pubmed = {pmid:28902890},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0184743},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/838009},
}