001     838142
005     20240712100834.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0230.1
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1558-8424
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1558-8432
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a WOS:000393298900012
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a 2128/20366
|2 Handle
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2017-06846
082 _ _ |a 550
100 1 _ |a Heymsfield, Andrew
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Dependence of the Ice Water Content and Snowfall Rate on Temperature, Globally: Comparison of in Situ Observations, Satellite Active Remote Sensing Retrievals, and Global Climate Model Simulations
260 _ _ |a Boston, Mass.
|c 2017
|b AMS
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1507180623_26350
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Cloud ice microphysical properties measured or estimated from in situ aircraft observations are compared with global climate models and satellite active remote sensor retrievals. Two large datasets, with direct measurements of the ice water content (IWC) and encompassing data from polar to tropical regions, are combined to yield a large database of in situ measurements. The intention of this study is to identify strengths and weaknesses of the various methods used to derive ice cloud microphysical properties. The in situ data are measured with total water hygrometers, condensed water probes, and particle spectrometers. Data from polar, midlatitude, and tropical locations are included. The satellite data are retrieved from CloudSat/CALIPSO [the CloudSat Ice Cloud Property Product (2C-ICE) and 2C-SNOW-PROFILE] and Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Level2A. Although the 2C-ICE retrieval is for IWC, a method to use the IWC to get snowfall rates S is developed. The GPM retrievals are for snowfall rate only. Model results are derived using the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM5) and the Met Office Unified Model [Global Atmosphere 7 (GA7)]. The retrievals and model results are related to the in situ observations using temperature and are partitioned by geographical region. Specific variables compared between the in situ observations, models, and retrievals are the IWC and S. Satellite-retrieved IWCs are reasonably close in value to the in situ observations, whereas the models’ values are relatively low by comparison. Differences between the in situ IWCs and those from the other methods are compounded when S is considered, leading to model snowfall rates that are considerably lower than those derived from the in situ data. Anomalous trends with temperature are noted in some instances.
536 _ _ |a 244 - Composition and dynamics of the upper troposphere and middle atmosphere (POF3-244)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-244
|c POF3-244
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Krämer, Martina
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129131
|b 1
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Wood, Norman B.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Gettelman, Andrew
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Field, Paul R.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Liu, Guosheng
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
773 _ _ |a 10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0230.1
|g Vol. 56, no. 1, p. 189 - 215
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2227779-1
|n 1
|p 189 - 215
|t Journal of applied meteorology and climatology
|v 56
|y 2017
|x 1558-8432
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/838142/files/jamc-d-16-0230.1-1.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/838142/files/jamc-d-16-0230.1-1.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:838142
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p driver
|p VDB:Earth_Environment
|p VDB
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129131
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Atmosphäre und Klima
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-240
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-244
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200
|v Composition and dynamics of the upper troposphere and middle atmosphere
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Erde und Umwelt
914 1 _ |y 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b J APPL METEOROL CLIM : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013
|k IEK-7
|l Stratosphäre
|x 0
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-4-20101013


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21