% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Zimmermann:838379,
      author       = {Zimmermann, Eckart and Weidner, Ralph and Fink, Gereon
                      Rudolf},
      title        = {{S}patiotopic updating of visual feature information.},
      journal      = {Journal of vision},
      volume       = {17},
      number       = {12},
      issn         = {1534-7362},
      address      = {Rockville, Md.},
      publisher    = {ARVO},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2017-06991},
      pages        = {6, 1 - 9},
      year         = {2017},
      abstract     = {Saccades shift the retina with high-speed motion. In order
                      to compensate for the sudden displacement, the visuomotor
                      system needs to combine saccade-related information and
                      visual metrics. Many neurons in oculomotor but also in
                      visual areas shift their receptive field shortly before the
                      execution of a saccade (Duhamel, Colby, $\&$ Goldberg, 1992;
                      Nakamura $\&$ Colby, 2002). These shifts supposedly enable
                      the binding of information from before and after the
                      saccade. It is a matter of current debate whether these
                      shifts are merely location based (i.e., involve remapping of
                      abstract spatial coordinates) or also comprise information
                      about visual features. We have recently presented fMRI
                      evidence for a feature-based remapping mechanism in visual
                      areas V3, V4, and VO (Zimmermann, Weidner, Abdollahi, $\&$
                      Fink, 2016). In particular, we found fMRI adaptation in
                      cortical regions representing a stimulus' retinotopic as
                      well as its spatiotopic position. Here, we asked whether
                      spatiotopic adaptation exists independently from retinotopic
                      adaptation and which type of information is behaviorally
                      more relevant after saccade execution. We first adapted at
                      the saccade target location only and found a spatiotopic
                      tilt aftereffect. Then, we simultaneously adapted both the
                      fixation and the saccade target location but with opposite
                      tilt orientations. As a result, adaptation from the fixation
                      location was carried retinotopically to the saccade target
                      position. The opposite tilt orientation at the retinotopic
                      location altered the effects induced by spatiotopic
                      adaptation. More precisely, it cancelled out spatiotopic
                      adaptation at the saccade target location. We conclude that
                      retinotopic and spatiotopic visual adaptation are
                      independent effects.},
      cin          = {INM-3},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:29049593},
      UT           = {WOS:000417128900006},
      doi          = {10.1167/17.12.6},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/838379},
}