% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Frank:838432,
      author       = {Frank, Matthias and Deja, Robert and Peters, Roland and
                      Blum, Ludger and Stolten, Detlef},
      title        = {{B}ypassing {R}enewable {V}ariability with a {R}eversible
                      {S}olid {O}xide {C}ell {P}lant},
      journal      = {Applied energy},
      volume       = {217},
      issn         = {0306-2619},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2017-07041},
      pages        = {101 - 112},
      year         = {2018},
      abstract     = {The primary problem renewable energy systems must overcome
                      is that electricity cannot always be produced in accordance
                      with demand. This is a major drawback compared to the
                      on-demand power production capability that fossil fuels
                      offer. New technologies can only compete, if a constant
                      power supply is permanently guaranteed. This constitutes a
                      critical benchmark that renewable energy technologies must
                      meet, if they are to replace fossil fuels. Reversible solid
                      oxide cells (rSOCs) represent a promising approach to
                      counteracting this issue. Here we show our developed rSOC
                      plant which incorporates both the storage via electrolysis
                      mode and the electricity production in the reverse, fuel
                      cell mode. In order to achieve a high level of efficiency,
                      the plant has been investigated and optimized with respect
                      to internal waste heat recovery and compression. The final
                      plant design shows an efficiency of up to $67.1\%$ in fuel
                      cell- and $76\%$ in electrolysis mode and therefore a round
                      trip efficiency of $51\%.$},
      cin          = {IEK-3},
      ddc          = {620},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013},
      pnm          = {135 - Fuel Cells (POF3-135) / SOFC - Solid Oxide Fuel Cell
                      (SOFC-20140602)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-135 / G:(DE-Juel1)SOFC-20140602},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000430030400010},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.115},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/838432},
}