% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Kasnatscheew:838472,
author = {Kasnatscheew, Johannes and Evertz, Marco and Kloepsch,
Richard and Streipert, Benjamin and Wagner, Ralf and
Cekic-Laskovic, Isidora and Winter, Martin},
title = {{L}earning from {E}lectrochemical {D}ata: {S}imple
{E}valuation and {C}lassification of {L}i{MO} 2 -type-based
{P}ositive {E}lectrodes for {L}i-{I}on {B}atteries},
journal = {Energy technology},
volume = {5},
number = {9},
issn = {2194-4288},
address = {Weinheim [u.a.]},
publisher = {Wiley-VCH},
reportid = {FZJ-2017-07075},
pages = {1670 - 1679},
year = {2017},
abstract = {The required boost in the specific energy of lithium-ion
battery (LIB) cells can only be achieved by increasing the
cell voltage and/or the specific capacities of the
electrodes. In the latter regard, the positive electrode
constitutes the specific energy bottleneck. Lithium
transition-metal oxides (LiMO2) such as
LiNixMnzCo1−x−zO2 (NMC) are regarded as the most
suitable positive electrode materials for next-generation
high-specific-energy LIBs. In this work, the
electrochemically induced structural stability limits as
well as the associated reversible specific energies and
specific energy efficiencies were assessed by means of
constant current charge/discharge experiments for the most
popular and promising LiMO2 compositions. The
electrochemically induced structural stability of the
positive host material was not determined by the applied
charge cut-off potential, but rather by the amount of
extracted Li+ ions. In this regard, the electrochemically
induced structural stability order of selected LiMO2
compositions was modified by assessing the structural
stability as a function of the Li+-ion extraction ratio.
With respect to application, relevant requirements (e.g.,
specific energy, specific energy efficiency,
temperature-dependent structural stability, kinetics)
revealed that NMC532 and NMC622 showed the best compromise
among the various LiMO2 compositions, revealing significant
insight into the structure–property relationship.},
cin = {IEK-12},
ddc = {620},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-12-20141217},
pnm = {131 - Electrochemical Storage (POF3-131)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-131},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000410137900022},
doi = {10.1002/ente.201700068},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/838472},
}