% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Wu:838704,
author = {Wu, Cheng and Pullinen, Iida and Andres, Stefanie and
Kiendler-Scharr, Astrid and Kleist, Einhard and Wahner,
Andreas and Wildt, Jürgen and Mentel, Thomas F.},
title = {13{C} labelling study of constitutive and stress-induced
terpenoide missions from {N}orway spruce and {S}cots pine},
journal = {Biogeosciences discussions},
volume = {260},
issn = {1810-6285},
address = {Katlenburg-Lindau [u.a.]},
publisher = {Copernicus},
reportid = {FZJ-2017-07265},
pages = {1 - 29},
year = {2017},
abstract = {Due to their large source strengths, biogenic volatile
organic compounds (BVOCs) are important for atmospheric
chemistry. Terpenoids, mainly consisting of isoprene,
monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes, are the dominant BVOC
class. There are two general mechanisms for their emissions:
emissions directly from de novo biosynthesis (de novo
emissions) and emissions from organs wherein the terpenoids
are stored (pool emissions). While isoprene emissions are
pure de novo emissions, the mechanism for monoterpene and
sesquiterpene emissions is not always distinct. In
particular, conifers have large storage pools and both
mechanisms may contribute to the emissions.To obtain more
insight into the mechanisms of the terpenoid emissions from
Eurasian conifers, we conducted 13CO2 and 13C-glucose
labelling studies with Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) and
Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). The results from the
labelling experiments were further compared to diurnal
modulations measured for the emission fluxes of the
respective terpenoids, as well as to their release from
reservoirs in needles and bark tissue.The comparison allowed
the following comprehensive statements for the investigated
conifers. Consistent to other studies, we found that
constitutive monoterpene emissions mainly originate from
storage pools but with compound-specific fractions of de
novo emissions. In contrast, stress-induced monoterpene and
sesquiterpene emissions are entirely of de novo nature. We
also found at least three different carbon sources for
monoterpene and sesquiterpene biosynthesis. These sources
differ with respect to the timescale after which the
recently assimilated carbon reappears in the emitted
terpenoids. Carbon directly obtained from assimilated has a
short turnover time of few hours, while carbon from other
alternative carbon sources has intermediate turnover times
of few days and even longer. Terpenoid biosynthesis is not
restricted to the presence of light and the carbon for
terpenoid biosynthesis can be delivered from the alternative
carbon sources. In particular for sesquiterpenes, there can
be substantial de novo emissions in darkness reaching up to
around $60 \%$ of the daytime emissions. The use of the
alternative carbon sources for sesquiterpene synthesis is
probably linked to the mevalonic acid (MVA) pathway. The
higher the contribution of the MVA pathway to terpenoid
synthesis, the higher is the nocturnal de novo emission.In
general, the emission mechanisms of monoterpene and
sesquiterpene are more complex than assumed so far. Besides
pools for terpenoids themselves, there are also pools for
terpenoids precursors. Terpenoid synthesis from alternative
carbon sources leads to nighttime emissions and hence the
amplitude of diurnal modulations of terpenoid emissions may
be determined by an overlap of three mechanisms involved:
emissions from storage pools, emissions in parallel to CO2
uptake and emissions from alternative carbon sources.},
cin = {IEK-8},
ddc = {570},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013},
pnm = {243 - Tropospheric trace substances and their
transformation processes (POF3-243)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-243},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
doi = {10.5194/bg-2017-260},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/838704},
}