001     838710
005     20240712100954.0
024 7 _ |a 10.5194/amt-2017-288
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/15723
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a altmetric:24858949
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2017-07270
082 _ _ |a 550
100 1 _ |a Gkatzelis, Georgios
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)165645
|b 0
|u fzj
245 _ _ |a Comparison of three aerosol chemical characterization techniques utilizing PTR-ToF-MS: A study on freshly formed and aged biogenic SOA
260 _ _ |a Katlenburg-Lindau
|c 2017
|b Copernicus
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1509622897_7893
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a An inter-comparison of different aerosol chemical characterization techniques has been performed as part of a chamber study of biogenic SOA formation and aging at the atmosphere simulation chamber SAPHIR. Three different aerosol sampling techniques, the aerosol collection module (ACM), the chemical analysis of aerosol on-line (CHARON) and the collection thermal desorption unit (TD) were connected to Proton Transfer Reaction Time of Flight Mass Spectrometers (PTR-ToF-MS) to provide chemical characterization of the SOA. The techniques were compared among each other and to results from an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (AMS) and a Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer (SMPS). The experiments investigated SOA formation from the ozonolysis of β-pinene, limonene, a β-pinene/limonene mix and real plant emissions from Pinus sylvestris L. (Scots pine). The SOA was subsequently aged by photooxidation except for limonene SOA which was aged by NO3 oxidation.Despite significant differences in the aerosol collection and desorption methods of the PTR based techniques, the determined chemical composition, i.e. the same major contributing signals were found by all instruments for the different chemical systems studied. These signals could be attributed to known products expected from the oxidation of the examined monoterpenes. The sampling and desorption method of ACM and TD, provided additional information on the volatility of individual compounds and showed relatively good agreement.Averaged over all experiments, the total aerosol mass recovery compared to an SMPS varied from 80 ± 10 %, 51 ± 5 % and 27 ± 3 % for CHARON, ACM and TD, respectively. Comparison to the oxygen to carbon ratios (O : C) obtained by AMS showed that all PTR based techniques observed lower O : C ratios indicating a loss of molecular oxygen either during aerosol sampling or detection. The differences in total mass recovery and O : C between the three instruments resulted predominately from differences in the field strength (E/N) in the drift-tube reaction ionization chambers of the PTR-ToF-MS instruments and from dissimilarities in the collection/desorption of aerosols. Laboratory case studies showed that PTR-ToF-MS E/N conditions influenced fragmentation which resulted in water loss and carbon-oxygen bond breakage of the detected molecules. Since ACM and TD were operated in higher E/N compared to CHARON this resulted to higher fragmentation, thus affecting primarily the detected oxygen and carbon content and therefore also the mass recovery. Overall, these techniques have been shown to provide valuable insight on the chemical characteristics of BSOA, and can address unknown thermodynamic properties such as partitioning coefficient values and volatility patterns down to a compound specific level.
536 _ _ |a 243 - Tropospheric trace substances and their transformation processes (POF3-243)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-243
|c POF3-243
|f POF III
|x 0
536 _ _ |0 G:(DE-Juel1)HITEC-20170406
|x 1
|c HITEC-20170406
|a HITEC - Helmholtz Interdisciplinary Doctoral Training in Energy and Climate Research (HITEC) (HITEC-20170406)
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Tillmann, Ralf
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)5344
|b 1
|e Corresponding author
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Hohaus, Thorsten
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)161442
|b 2
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Müller, Markus
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Eichler, Philipp
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Xu, Kang-Ming
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Schlag, Patrick
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)4548
|b 6
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Schmitt, Sebastian H.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)161557
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Wegener, Robert
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)2367
|b 8
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Kaminski, Martin
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)3039
|b 9
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Holzinger, Rupert
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 10
700 1 _ |a Wisthaler, Armin
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 11
700 1 _ |a Kiendler-Scharr, Astrid
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)4528
|b 12
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.5194/amt-2017-288
|g p. 1 - 31
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2507817-3
|p 1 - 31
|t Atmospheric measurement techniques discussions
|v 288
|y 2017
|x 1867-8610
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/838710/files/amt-2017-288.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/838710/files/amt-2017-288.gif?subformat=icon
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-1440
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/838710/files/amt-2017-288.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-180
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/838710/files/amt-2017-288.jpg?subformat=icon-180
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-640
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/838710/files/amt-2017-288.jpg?subformat=icon-640
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/838710/files/amt-2017-288.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:838710
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p driver
|p VDB
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)165645
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)5344
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)161442
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)4548
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 7
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)161557
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)2367
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 9
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)3039
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 12
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)4528
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Atmosphäre und Klima
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-240
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-243
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200
|v Tropospheric trace substances and their transformation processes
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Erde und Umwelt
914 1 _ |y 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013
|k IEK-8
|l Troposphäre
|x 0
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-3-20101013


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21