001     840034
005     20210129231727.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1093/treephys/tpx113
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0829-318X
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1758-4469
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a pmid:29036462
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000422839200006
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a altmetric:27547306
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2017-07600
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 630
100 1 _ |a Kleiber, Anita
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Drought effects on root and needle terpenoid content of a coastal and an interior Douglas fir provenance
260 _ _ |a Victoria, BC
|c 2017
|b Heron
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1513694714_27848
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) is a conifer species that stores large amounts of terpenoids, mainly monoterpenoids in resin ducts of various tissues. The effects of drought on stored leaf terpenoid concentrations in trees are scarcely studied and published data are partially controversial, since reduced, unaffected or elevated terpenoid contents due to drought have been reported. Even less is known on the effect of drought on root terpenoids. In the present work, we investigated the effect of reduced water availability on the terpenoid content in roots and needles of Douglas fir seedlings. Two contrasting Douglas fir provenances were studied: an interior provenance (var. glauca) with assumed higher drought resistance, and a coastal provenance (var. menziesii) with assumed lower drought resistance. We tested the hypothesis that both provenances show specific patterns of stored terpenoids and that the patterns will change in response to drought in both, needles and roots. We further expected stronger changes in the less drought tolerant coastal provenance. For this purpose, we performed an experiment under controlled conditions, in which the trees were exposed to moderate and severe drought stress. According to our expectations, the study revealed clear provenance-specific terpenoid patterns in needles. However, such patterns were not detected in the roots. Drought slightly increased the needle terpenoid contents of the coastal but not of the interior provenance. We also observed increased terpenoid abundance mainly in roots of the moderately stressed coastal provenance. Overall, from the observed provenance-specific reactions with increased terpenoid levels in trees of the coastal origin in response to drought, we conclude on functions of terpenoids for abiotic stress tolerance that might be fulfilled by other, constitutively expressed mechanisms in drought-adapted interior provenances.
536 _ _ |a 899 - ohne Topic (POF3-899)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899
|c POF3-899
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Duan, Qiuxiao
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Jansen, Kirstin
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Junker, Laura
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)168454
|b 3
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Kammerer, Bernd
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Rennenberg, Heinz
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Ensminger, Ingo
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Gessler, Arthur
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Kreuzwieser, Jürgen
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 8
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.1093/treephys/tpx113
|g p. 1 - 11
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1473475-8
|n 12
|p 1648–1658
|t Tree physiology
|v 37
|y 2017
|x 1758-4469
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/840034/files/tpx113.pdf
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/840034/files/tpx113.gif?subformat=icon
|x icon
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/840034/files/tpx113.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
|x icon-1440
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/840034/files/tpx113.jpg?subformat=icon-180
|x icon-180
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/840034/files/tpx113.jpg?subformat=icon-640
|x icon-640
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/840034/files/tpx113.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
|y Restricted
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:840034
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)168454
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Programmungebundene Forschung
|l ohne Programm
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-890
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-800
|v ohne Topic
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2017
915 _ _ |a Allianz-Lizenz / DFG
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0400
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b TREE PHYSIOL : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
|k IBG-2
|l Pflanzenwissenschaften
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21