% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{vanderLoop:840072,
author = {van der Loop, Tibert H. and Ottosson, Niklas and Vad,
Thomas and Sager, Wiebke and Bakker, Huib J. and Woutersen,
Sander},
title = {{C}ommunication: {S}low proton-charge diffusion in
nanoconfined water},
journal = {The journal of chemical physics},
volume = {146},
number = {13},
issn = {1089-7690},
address = {Melville, NY},
publisher = {American Institute of Physics},
reportid = {FZJ-2017-07636},
pages = {131101 -},
year = {2017},
abstract = {We investigate proton-charge mobility in nanoscopic water
droplets with tuneable size. We find that the diffusion of
confined proton charges causes a dielectric relaxation
process with a maximum-loss frequency determined by the
diffusion constant. In volumes less than ∼5 nm in
diameter, proton-charge diffusion slows down significantly
with decreasing size: for diameters <1nm, the diffusion
constant is about 100 times smaller than in bulk water. The
low mobility probably results from the more rigid
hydrogen-bond network of nanoconfined water, since
proton-charge mobility in water relies on collective
hydrogen-bond rearrangements.The transport of protons
through nanometer-sized volumes of liquid water occurs in
systems ranging from porous minerals,1 fuel-cell
membranes,2–4 metal-organic frameworks5–7 and zeolites,8
to the living cell. In contrast to proton diffusion in bulk
water which has been studied extensively,9–13
comparatively little is known about proton transfer in such
nanoscopic volumes. Previous work has demonstrated that the
kinetics of photo-induced deprotonation and subsequent
geminate recombination of photoacids can change upon
nanoscopic confinement in reverse micelles.14,15 It was
however also found15 that in reverse micelles with neutral
surfactants, the photoacid molecules tend to attach to the
surface (where no photo-induced deprotonation occurs), which
complicates the results, while in nanoscopic reverse
micelles, with ionic surfactants, the counter-ion
concentration is prohibitively large: typically >10M for
water-pool diameters d < 5nm. In addition, for small
reverse micelles, the size of the photoacid probe molecule
becomes comparable to the water volume, which sets an
intrinsic limitation to this approach. Nano-confined proton
mobility has also been investigated using quasi-elastic
neutron scattering16–19 and nuclear magnetic resonance
spectroscopy.20,21 Both these techniques, however, probe the
mobility of the proton mass rather than that of the proton
charge, and these mobilities can be very different due to
the contribution of the Grotthuss mechanism to the
proton-charge mobility.22–24 Here, we probe the mobility
of aqueous proton charges in nano-confinement directly by
observing their response to an externally applied
oscillating electric field. To investigate proton-charge
transport in confinement, we prepare nanoscopic water
volumes in self-assembling reverse micelles in cyclohexane
(see supplementary material). We use a nonionic surfactant
(Igepal CO-520) to avoid interfacial charge effects25–27
and size-dependent surfactant counter-ion concentrations.
Igepal contains hydroxy and ether O atoms, which have
pKb∼16and 18, so protons do not “stick” to the
surfactant.Since reverse micelles can take up water
molecules in their hydrophilic interior, the ratio w0 =
[H2O]/[surfactant] can be used to tune the size of the
enclosed water volumes.28,29 We use small-angle x-ray
scattering to characterize the structure of the reverse
micelles.30,31 The investigated reverse micelles have a
spherical shape, a polydispersity parameter <0.2, and
interact as hard spheres. We observe a linear size
dependence on w0, with a proportionality factor of 0.42 ±
0.01 nm for the water pool diameter (Fig. 1(a)). To study
ions in nanoconfined water, we use appropriate aqueous
solutions in the preparation of the reverse micelles. Using
1M HCl or LiCl as the interior aqueous phase has no
influence on the shape or size of the reverse micelles (Fig.
1(b)).},
cin = {PGI-5},
ddc = {540},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)PGI-5-20110106},
pnm = {143 - Controlling Configuration-Based Phenomena (POF3-143)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-143},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:28390345},
UT = {WOS:000399073300003},
doi = {10.1063/1.4979714},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/840072},
}