% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Xu:840135,
author = {Xu, Liangfei and Hu, Junming and Cheng, Siliang and Fang,
Chuan and Li, Jianqiu and Ouyang, Minggao and Lehnert,
Werner},
title = {{R}obust control of internal states in a polymer
electrolyte membrane fuel cell air-feed system by
considering actuator properties},
journal = {International journal of hydrogen energy},
volume = {42},
number = {18},
issn = {0360-3199},
address = {New York, NY [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier},
reportid = {FZJ-2017-07695},
pages = {13171 - 13191},
year = {2017},
abstract = {Air stoichiometry, pressure, and relative humidity in the
air-feed system of a vehicular polymer electrolyte membrane
fuel cell (PEMFC) influence efficiency, durability and
reliability. It is critical to develop robust control
algorithms for these internal states to improve system
performance. There is limited extant research on designing
robust control algorithms that consider the three internal
states as well as the constraints of real actuators, such as
an air compressor, a membrane humidifier, and a back-up
pressure valve (BPV). This study examines robust control
strategies for the three internal states based on adaptive
second order sliding mode (ASOSM) and nonlinear
proportional-integral (NPI) feedback control algorithms. In
the study, control targets are established based on stable
properties of the PEMFC system. The study involves proposing
and comparing five control strategies that are a combination
of NPI and ASOSM algorithms. The following results are
obtained: (1) the stable control targets for the three
internal states are followed adequately by using an NPI or
an ASOSM algorithm and differences only exists in dynamic
processes; (2) with respect to the control of air
stoichiometry, an NPI algorithm performs better than an
ASOSM algorithm as chattering in air stoichiometry can be
avoided and the convergence time to the target value is
acceptable; (3) with respect to the control of cathodic
pressure, an ASOSM algorithm performs better than an NPI
algorithm as the overshoots in cathodic pressures can be
effectively reduced; (4) with respect to the control of
relative humidity, both NPI and ASOSM algorithms lead to a
practical bang–bang strategy. The strategy that performs
the best among the five strategies is selected, and the
robustness of the selected strategy with respect to
parameter uncertainties is verified.},
cin = {IEK-3},
ddc = {660},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013},
pnm = {135 - Fuel Cells (POF3-135)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-135},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000402347400022},
doi = {10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.03.191},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/840135},
}