% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Thust:840173,
author = {Thust, Andreas and Barthel, Juri and Jia, Chun-Lin},
title = {{I}s {HRTEM} {I}mage {S}imulation {C}orrect? {A}
{P}remise-{F}ree {C}alibration {A}pproach},
journal = {Microscopy and microanalysis},
volume = {22},
number = {S3},
issn = {1435-8115},
address = {New York, NY},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
reportid = {FZJ-2017-07728},
pages = {1390 - 1391},
year = {2016},
abstract = {The comparison of absolute image intensities between
experiment and simulation in high-resolutiontransmission
electron microscopy (HRTEM) is a long-standing problem,
which led to a multitude ofdiscussions and speculations in
the past. A huge contrast mismatch, which was first stated
by Hytch andStobbs in 1994 [1], could be largely explained
in 2009 as a consequence of neglecting the correctmodulation
transfer function (MTF) of the recording camera in image
simulation [2]. Further smallerrefinements to image
simulation, which incorporate also the so-called
image-spread effect [3], ledrecently to nearly perfect
absolute-intensity matches between experiment and simulation
[4,5].},
cin = {ER-C-2},
ddc = {570},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)ER-C-2-20170209},
pnm = {143 - Controlling Configuration-Based Phenomena (POF3-143)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-143},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
doi = {10.1017/S1431927616007790},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/840173},
}