% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Schrn:840429,
author = {Schrön, Martin and Köhli, Markus and Scheiffele, Lena and
Iwema, Joost and Bogena, Heye and Lv, Ling and Martini,
Edoardo and Baroni, Gabriele and Rosolem, Rafael and Weimar,
Jannis and Mai, Juliane and Cuntz, Matthias and Rebmann,
Corinna and Oswald, Sascha E. and Dietrich, Peter and
Schmidt, Ulrich and Zacharias, Steffen},
title = {{I}mproving calibration and validation of cosmic-ray
neutron sensors in the light of spatial sensitivity},
journal = {Hydrology and earth system sciences},
volume = {21},
number = {10},
issn = {1607-7938},
address = {Katlenburg-Lindau},
publisher = {EGU},
reportid = {FZJ-2017-07946},
pages = {5009 - 5030},
year = {2017},
abstract = {In the last few years the method of cosmic-ray neutron
sensing (CRNS) has gained popularity among hydrologists,
physicists, and land-surface modelers. The sensor provides
continuous soil moisture data, averaged over several
hectares and tens of decimeters in depth. However, the
signal still may contain unidentified features of
hydrological processes, and many calibration datasets are
often required in order to find reliable relations between
neutron intensity and water dynamics. Recent insights into
environmental neutrons accurately described the spatial
sensitivity of the sensor and thus allowed one to quantify
the contribution of individual sample locations to the CRNS
signal. Consequently, data points of calibration and
validation datasets are suggested to be averaged using a
more physically based weighting approach. In this work, a
revised sensitivity function is used to calculate weighted
averages of point data. The function is different from the
simple exponential convention by the extraordinary
sensitivity to the first few meters around the probe, and by
dependencies on air pressure, air humidity, soil moisture,
and vegetation. The approach is extensively tested at six
distinct monitoring sites: two sites with multiple
calibration datasets and four sites with continuous time
series datasets. In all cases, the revised averaging method
improved the performance of the CRNS products. The revised
approach further helped to reveal hidden hydrological
processes which otherwise remained unexplained in the data
or were lost in the process of overcalibration. The
presented weighting approach increases the overall accuracy
of CRNS products and will have an impact on all their
applications in agriculture, hydrology, and modeling.},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
(POF3-255)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000412473100001},
doi = {10.5194/hess-21-5009-2017},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/840429},
}