000840432 001__ 840432
000840432 005__ 20210129231831.0
000840432 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.07.034
000840432 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0004-6981
000840432 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1352-2310
000840432 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1873-2844
000840432 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1878-2442
000840432 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000411298800013
000840432 037__ $$aFZJ-2017-07949
000840432 082__ $$a550
000840432 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aZhao, Zichao$$b0
000840432 245__ $$aNitrification inhibitor's effect on mitigating N 2 O emissions was weakened by urease inhibitor in calcareous soils
000840432 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier Science$$c2017
000840432 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000840432 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000840432 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1512374550_12594
000840432 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000840432 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000840432 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000840432 520__ $$aThe application of nitrification or urease inhibitors together with nitrogen (N) fertilizer has been proposed to reduce N losses, including nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, from agricultural soils. We measured N2O fluxes, crop yield and plant N content over 3 years (2012–2015) to evaluate the long-term effects of nitrification and/or urease inhibitors on N2O emissions, crop production and N use efficiency (NUE) in an intensively farmed wheat–maize system in northern China. The experiment consisted of the following five treatments: 1) CK, no N fertilizer; 2) U, urea; 3) NI, urea with 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP); 4) UI, urea with N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT); and 5) NIUI, urea with combined DMPP and NBPT. Compared with the U treatment, the NI, NIUI and UI treatments mitigated cumulative N2O emissions by 55%, 40% and 21% in the maize season, respectively, and 47%, 40% and 33% in the wheat season, respectively. The annual direct emission factors of N2O for the U, NI, UI and NIUI treatments were 0.4%, 0.1%, 0.3% and 0.2%, respectively. The NIUI, NI and UI treatments increased the annual crop yield (7%, 6% and 4%) and the NUE (15%, 10% and 7%) relative to the U treatment. The NI treatment showed the best effect on mitigating N2O emissions, but its efficacy was reduced when applied together with UI. This indicates that more studies are required focusing on the performances and mechanisms of these two inhibitors in alkaline and low organic carbon soils.
000840432 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$a255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)$$cPOF3-255$$fPOF III$$x0
000840432 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000840432 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aWu, Di$$b1
000840432 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)145865$$aBol, Roland$$b2
000840432 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aShi, Yuefeng$$b3
000840432 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aGuo, Yanbin$$b4
000840432 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMeng, Fanqiao$$b5$$eCorresponding author
000840432 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aWu, Wenliang$$b6
000840432 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1499889-0$$a10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.07.034$$gVol. 166, p. 142 - 150$$p142 - 150$$tAtmospheric environment$$v166$$x1352-2310$$y2017
000840432 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/840432/files/1-s2.0-S1352231017304752-main.pdf$$yRestricted
000840432 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/840432/files/1-s2.0-S1352231017304752-main.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yRestricted
000840432 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/840432/files/1-s2.0-S1352231017304752-main.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yRestricted
000840432 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/840432/files/1-s2.0-S1352231017304752-main.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yRestricted
000840432 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/840432/files/1-s2.0-S1352231017304752-main.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yRestricted
000840432 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/840432/files/1-s2.0-S1352231017304752-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000840432 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:840432$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pVDB
000840432 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)145865$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000840432 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x0
000840432 9141_ $$y2017
000840432 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000840432 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000840432 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000840432 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000840432 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bATMOS ENVIRON : 2015
000840432 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000840432 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000840432 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000840432 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000840432 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000840432 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000840432 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000840432 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
000840432 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000840432 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000840432 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000840432 980__ $$ajournal
000840432 980__ $$aVDB
000840432 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000840432 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED