000840436 001__ 840436
000840436 005__ 20210129231832.0
000840436 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.167
000840436 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0048-9697
000840436 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1879-1026
000840436 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:28763653
000840436 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000410352900061
000840436 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:23376067
000840436 037__ $$aFZJ-2017-07953
000840436 082__ $$a333.7
000840436 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aWang, Xiaoguo$$b0
000840436 245__ $$aLand use change effects on ecosystem carbon budget in the Sichuan Basin of Southwest China: Conversion of cropland to forest ecosystem
000840436 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier Science$$c2017
000840436 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000840436 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000840436 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1512375171_12600
000840436 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000840436 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000840436 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000840436 520__ $$aIn the humid subtropics, conversion of cropland to forest has been recognized to influence carbon cycling (e.g., soil CO2 emissions) and the associated ecosystem carbon balance. A three-year field study was conducted in situ to quantitatively evaluate effects of land use change on carbon budget in a cropland (under winter wheat-summer maize rotation) comparison with the adjacent forest ecosystem. During the three-year experimental period, on average, soil heterotrophic respirations were 35.19 mg C·m− 2·h− 1 for the cropland and 40.02 mg C·m− 2·h− 1 for the adjacent forest ecosystem. The quantified net primary production (NPP) were 8724.78 kg C·ha− 1·year− 1 for the cropland (3218.14 kg C·ha− 1 for winter wheat season and 5506.64 kg C·ha− 1 for summer maize season) and 6478.99 kg C·ha− 1·year− 1 for the adjacent forest ecosystem. Thus, the average positive net ecosystem production (NEP) of 5139.33 kg C·ha− 1·year− 1 and 2790.43 kg C·ha− 1·year− 1 were gained in the cropland and the adjacent forest ecosystem, respectively. Nonetheless, if take into consideration of crop grain harvest (i.e., removal), the mean NEP was only 976.69 kg C·ha− 1·year− 1 for cropland which were over three-fold lower than for the adjacent forest ecosystem. The practice of conversion of cropland (maize-wheat rotation system) to forest consequently resulted in an average annual net carbon sequestration of 1813.74 kg C·ha− 1·year− 1 in the study. Therefore, our findings highlight that practices of conversion of subtropical cropland to forest commonly conducted in the last decades act as sinks of atmospheric CO2 in southwest China.
000840436 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$a255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)$$cPOF3-255$$fPOF III$$x0
000840436 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000840436 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)166012$$aZhou, Minghua$$b1$$eCorresponding author
000840436 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLi, Tao$$b2
000840436 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKe, Yun$$b3
000840436 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aZhu, Bo$$b4
000840436 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1498726-0$$a10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.167$$gVol. 609, p. 556 - 562$$p556 - 562$$tThe science of the total environment$$v609$$x0048-9697$$y2017
000840436 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/840436/files/1-s2.0-S0048969717318703-main.pdf$$yRestricted
000840436 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/840436/files/1-s2.0-S0048969717318703-main.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yRestricted
000840436 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/840436/files/1-s2.0-S0048969717318703-main.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yRestricted
000840436 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/840436/files/1-s2.0-S0048969717318703-main.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yRestricted
000840436 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/840436/files/1-s2.0-S0048969717318703-main.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yRestricted
000840436 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/840436/files/1-s2.0-S0048969717318703-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000840436 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:840436$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pVDB
000840436 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)166012$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000840436 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x0
000840436 9141_ $$y2017
000840436 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000840436 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bSCI TOTAL ENVIRON : 2015
000840436 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000840436 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000840436 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000840436 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000840436 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000840436 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000840436 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000840436 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000840436 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000840436 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000840436 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000840436 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000840436 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000840436 980__ $$ajournal
000840436 980__ $$aVDB
000840436 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000840436 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED