000841318 001__ 841318
000841318 005__ 20210129232013.0
000841318 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1111/jiec.12575
000841318 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1088-1980
000841318 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1530-9290
000841318 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000417766200012
000841318 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:30697337
000841318 037__ $$aFZJ-2017-08407
000841318 041__ $$aEnglish
000841318 082__ $$a570
000841318 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)168163$$aWulf, Christina$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
000841318 245__ $$aLessons learned from a life cycle sustainability assessment of rare earth permanent magnets
000841318 260__ $$aOxford [u.a.]$$bWiley-Blackwell$$c2017
000841318 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000841318 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000841318 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1513326586_10532
000841318 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000841318 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000841318 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000841318 520__ $$an order to address methodological challenges during life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA), this article combines the results of a life cycle assessment (LCA), a life cycle costing, and a social LCA using the example of a complex product: a rare earth permanent magnet for use in wind turbines. The article presents different approaches for combining the results of separate assessments with its attendant methodological challenges. Different normalization, aggregation methods, and weighing factors are applied and their impacts on the results are compared. The underlying case study makes an evaluation of these different methodologies more concrete. Results show that the normalization method applied has a greater influence on the overall results than the aggregation method or weighting factors. Additionally, this study shows that indifference thresholds should be applied to avoid overestimation of small impacts. Indifference thresholds ensure that impact categories with nearly the same results for all analyzed options are treated as identical results. The study also indicates the importance of the question of how much compensation between impacts is desirable. Despite the impact of these factors, the chosen case study of an LCSA for permanent magnets with different supply routes for rare earths shows that the ranking of Chinese production is the most problematic irrespective of the approaches applied.
000841318 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153$$a153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)$$cPOF3-153$$fPOF III$$x0
000841318 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000841318 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)130493$$aZapp, Petra$$b1$$ufzj
000841318 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)130483$$aSchreiber, Andrea$$b2$$ufzj
000841318 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)130473$$aMarx, Josefine$$b3$$ufzj
000841318 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)130482$$aSchlör, Holger$$b4$$ufzj
000841318 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2035542-7$$a10.1111/jiec.12575$$gVol. 21, no. 6, p. 1578 - 1590$$n6$$p1578 - 1590$$tJournal of industrial ecology$$v21$$x1088-1980$$y2017
000841318 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/841318/files/Wulf_et_al-1578-Journal_of_Industrial_Ecology.pdf$$yRestricted
000841318 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/841318/files/Wulf_et_al-1578-Journal_of_Industrial_Ecology.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yRestricted
000841318 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/841318/files/Wulf_et_al-1578-Journal_of_Industrial_Ecology.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yRestricted
000841318 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/841318/files/Wulf_et_al-1578-Journal_of_Industrial_Ecology.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yRestricted
000841318 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/841318/files/Wulf_et_al-1578-Journal_of_Industrial_Ecology.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yRestricted
000841318 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/841318/files/Wulf_et_al-1578-Journal_of_Industrial_Ecology.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000841318 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:841318$$pVDB
000841318 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)168163$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000841318 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)130493$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000841318 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)130483$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000841318 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)130473$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
000841318 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)130482$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b4$$kFZJ
000841318 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-150$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bEnergie$$lTechnologie, Innovation und Gesellschaft$$vAssessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security$$x0
000841318 9141_ $$y2017
000841318 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bJ IND ECOL : 2015
000841318 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000841318 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000841318 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000841318 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000841318 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000841318 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000841318 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000841318 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000841318 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000841318 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000841318 920__ $$lyes
000841318 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013$$kIEK-STE$$lSystemforschung und Technologische Entwicklung$$x0
000841318 980__ $$ajournal
000841318 980__ $$aVDB
000841318 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
000841318 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED