% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Grube:841706,
      author       = {Grube, Thomas and Doré, Larissa and Hoffrichter, André
                      and Hombach, Laura Elisabeth and Raths, Stephan and
                      Robinius, Martin and Nobis, Moritz and Schiebahn, Sebastian
                      and Tietze, Vanessa and Schnettler, Armin and Walther, Grit
                      and Stolten, Detlef},
      title        = {{A}n {O}ption for {S}tranded {R}enewables:
                      {E}lectrolytic-{H}ydrogen in {F}uture {E}nergy {S}ystems},
      journal      = {Sustainable energy $\&$ fuels},
      volume       = {2},
      number       = {7},
      issn         = {2398-4902},
      address      = {Cambridge},
      publisher    = {Royal Society of Chemistry},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2018-00014},
      pages        = {1500 - 1515},
      year         = {2018},
      abstract     = {Future energy systems will likely be challenged by large
                      quantities of stranded renewable electricity that cannot be
                      used in the conventional electrical grid. Using surplus
                      electricity for electrolysis and thereby producing hydrogen
                      is seen as a valuable solution functioning as an energy
                      storage and transport medium and providing other sectors,
                      such as transport or industry, with required feedstocks at
                      the same time. In this study, we suggest using a set of
                      assessment tools to highlight the quantitative potential,
                      cost and environmental performance of electrolytic hydrogen
                      production, transmission and storage. Our approach employs
                      power sector modeling for Germany with three sequential
                      elements: (i) a market model, (ii) power flow modeling, and
                      (iii) re-dispatch modeling. The results were then used to
                      identify suitable locations for large scale electrolysis
                      plants. Electrolysis, large-scale gas storage, a
                      transmission pipeline and other system components were
                      scaled-up and the total cost was calculated. In a final
                      step, we looked at greenhouse gas emissions as one of the
                      major aspects regarding the environmental performance of the
                      hydrogen delivered. Based on our analysis, annual hydrogen
                      production rates of up to 189 kilotons have been determined
                      for the state of Schleswig-Holstein, which exhibits the
                      largest potential for utilizing surplus power from
                      renewables. The economic analysis reveals a hydrogen cost of
                      3.63–5.81€ kg−1, including installations, for
                      large-scale storage and transmission. If surplus power from
                      renewables is used for hydrogen production, the total
                      greenhouse gas emissions of hydrogen provision were
                      determined to be up to 435 gCO2-eq. kg−1. Using grid
                      electricity, this value increased to some 17 000 gCO2-eq.
                      kg−1.},
      cin          = {IEK-3},
      ddc          = {660},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013},
      pnm          = {134 - Electrolysis and Hydrogen (POF3-134)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-134},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000436519000011},
      doi          = {10.1039/C8SE00008E},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/841706},
}