001     841876
005     20250129092454.0
024 7 _ |a 2128/16619
|2 Handle
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2018-00173
041 _ _ |a English
100 1 _ |a Kumar, Shashank
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)169828
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
|u fzj
111 2 _ |a 19th International Workshop on Radiation Imaging Detectors
|g IWORID
|c Krakow
|d 2018-07-02 - 2018-07-06
|w Poland
245 _ _ |a Photodetection characterisation of SiPM technologies for their application in scintillator based neutron detectors
260 _ _ |c 2017
336 7 _ |a Conference Paper
|0 33
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a INPROCEEDINGS
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a conferenceObject
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a CONFERENCE_POSTER
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Conference Poster
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Poster
|b poster
|m poster
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)24
|s 1516288561_19728
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
|x After Call
520 _ _ |a Small angle neutron scattering (SANS) experiments have become one of the mostly used techniques in the investigation of the properties of material on the atomic scale. Till 2001 3He based detectors were extensively used for neutron detection in these experiments, but due to the scarcity of 3He researchers started to look for alternatives [1]. Scintillation based solid state detectors appeared as a prominent alternative. A neutron scattered by a sample under test impinges a scintillating material and initiates a nuclear reaction that produces secondary particles which in a second scattering process generate a light emission that can be detected by an underlying photodetector. By determining the neutron scattering angle, the momentum transfer of the scattered neutron can be identified. Using this information the sample structure can be determined with very high spatial resolution [2].Silicon photomultipliers (SiPM), having lower bias voltages compared to photomultiplier tubes, insensitivity to a magnetic field, the possibility of modular design and higher readout rates, have the potential of becoming a photon detector of choice in these experiments. In a previous investigation, the increase of the dark signal due to irradiation of the SiPM with cold neutrons has been quantified and this technology proved feasible for this kind of applications [2]. Here, a detailed comparative analysis of photon detection efficiency (PDE) for three different SiPM technologies, before and after irradiation with cold neutrons, has been carried out. For this purpose, we irradiated one digital and two different analog SiPM arrays with cold neutrons having 5Å wavelength and up to a dose of 6E12 n/cm2 at the KWS-1 instrument of the Heinz Maier-Leibnitz Zentrum (MLZ) in Garching, Germany. As stated in [2] a dose for a 10-year equivalent non-stop operation of the detector at the KWS-1 instrument of the MLZ is expected to be around 8.2E9 n/cm2. We have used a customized measuring system for evaluating the PDE of the sensors. The used system consists of a monochromatic light source and a lock-in amplifier based readout for the wavelengths between UV and NIR parts of the spectra.The first result can be observed in Fig.1 where a relative change of 3.8% in the PDE has been measured on the digital SiPM array after being irradiated up to 1.85E12 n/cm2.
536 _ _ |a 632 - Detector technology and systems (POF3-632)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-632
|c POF3-632
|f POF III
|x 0
536 _ _ |0 G:(DE-Juel1)HITEC-20170406
|x 1
|c HITEC-20170406
|a HITEC - Helmholtz Interdisciplinary Doctoral Training in Energy and Climate Research (HITEC) (HITEC-20170406)
650 2 7 |a Soft Condensed Matter
|0 V:(DE-MLZ)SciArea-210
|2 V:(DE-HGF)
|x 0
650 1 7 |a Engineering, Industrial Materials and Processing
|0 V:(DE-MLZ)GC-1601-2016
|2 V:(DE-HGF)
|x 0
693 _ _ |a Forschungs-Neutronenquelle Heinz Maier-Leibnitz
|e KWS-1: Small angle scattering diffractometer
|f NL3b
|1 EXP:(DE-MLZ)FRMII-20140101
|0 EXP:(DE-MLZ)KWS1-20140101
|5 EXP:(DE-MLZ)KWS1-20140101
|6 EXP:(DE-MLZ)NL3b-20140101
|x 0
700 1 _ |a Durini, Daniel
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)161528
|b 1
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Degenhardt, Carsten
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)167475
|b 2
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a van Waasen, Stefan
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)142562
|b 3
|u fzj
856 4 _ |u http://iworid2017.fis.agh.edu.pl/
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/841876/files/Shashank%20Kumar_IWORID%202017.pdf
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/841876/files/Shashank%20Kumar_IWORID%202017.gif?subformat=icon
|x icon
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/841876/files/Shashank%20Kumar_IWORID%202017.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
|x icon-1440
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/841876/files/Shashank%20Kumar_IWORID%202017.jpg?subformat=icon-180
|x icon-180
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/841876/files/Shashank%20Kumar_IWORID%202017.jpg?subformat=icon-640
|x icon-640
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/841876/files/Shashank%20Kumar_IWORID%202017.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:841876
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)169828
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)161528
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)167475
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)142562
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Materie
|l Materie und Technologie
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-630
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-632
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-600
|v Detector technology and systems
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2017
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)ZEA-2-20090406
|k ZEA-2
|l Zentralinstitut für Elektronik
|x 0
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a poster
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ZEA-2-20090406
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)PGI-4-20110106


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21