% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Mengotti:842532,
      author       = {Mengotti, Paola and Boers, Frank and Dombert, Pascasie L.
                      and Fink, Gereon R. and Vossel, Simone},
      title        = {{I}ntegrating modality-specific expectancies for the
                      deployment of spatial attention},
      journal      = {Scientific reports},
      volume       = {8},
      number       = {1},
      issn         = {2045-2322},
      address      = {London},
      publisher    = {Nature Publishing Group},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2018-00752},
      pages        = {1210},
      year         = {2018},
      abstract     = {The deployment of spatial attention is highly sensitive to
                      stimulus predictability. Despite evidence for strong
                      crossmodal links in spatial attentional systems, it remains
                      to be elucidated how concurrent but divergent predictions
                      for targets in different sensory modalities are integrated.
                      In a series of behavioral studies, we investigated the
                      processing of modality-specific expectancies using a
                      multimodal cueing paradigm in which auditory cues predicted
                      the location of visual or tactile targets with
                      modality-specific cue predictability. The cue predictability
                      for visual and tactile targets was manipulated
                      independently. A Bayesian ideal observer model with a
                      weighting factor was applied to trial-wise individual
                      response speed to investigate how the two probabilistic
                      contexts are integrated. Results showed that the degree of
                      integration depended on the level of predictability and on
                      the divergence of the modality-specific probabilistic
                      contexts (Experiments 1–2). However, when the two
                      probabilistic contexts were matched in their level of
                      predictability and were highly divergent (Experiment 3),
                      higher separate processing was favored, especially when
                      visual targets were processed. These findings suggest that
                      modality-specific predictions are flexibly integrated
                      according to their reliability, supporting the hypothesis of
                      separate modality-specific attentional systems that are
                      however linked to guarantee an efficient deployment of
                      spatial attention across the senses.},
      cin          = {INM-3 / INM-4},
      ddc          = {000},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406},
      pnm          = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:29352145},
      UT           = {WOS:000422891000040},
      doi          = {10.1038/s41598-018-19593-7},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/842532},
}