% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Post:843536,
author = {Post, Hanna and Hendricks-Franssen, Harrie-Jan and Han,
Xujun and Baatz, Roland and Montzka, Carsten and Schmidt,
Marius and Vereecken, Harry},
title = {{E}valuation and uncertainty analysis of regional-scale
{CLM}4.5 net carbon flux estimates},
journal = {Biogeosciences},
volume = {15},
number = {1},
issn = {1726-4189},
address = {Katlenburg-Lindau [u.a.]},
publisher = {Copernicus},
reportid = {FZJ-2018-01122},
pages = {187 - 208},
year = {2018},
abstract = {Modeling net ecosystem exchange (NEE) at the regional scale
with land surface models (LSMs) is relevant for the
estimation of regional carbon balances, but studies on it
are very limited. Furthermore, it is essential to better
understand and quantify the uncertainty of LSMs in order to
improve them. An important key variable in this respect is
the prognostic leaf area index (LAI), which is very
sensitive to forcing data and strongly affects the modeled
NEE. We applied the Community Land Model (CLM4.5-BGC) to the
Rur catchment in western Germany and compared estimated and
default ecological key parameters for modeling carbon fluxes
and LAI. The parameter estimates were previously estimated
with the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach DREAM(zs)
for four of the most widespread plant functional types in
the catchment. It was found that the catchment-scale annual
NEE was strongly positive with default parameter values but
negative (and closer to observations) with the estimated
values. Thus, the estimation of CLM parameters with local
NEE observations can be highly relevant when determining
regional carbon balances. To obtain a more comprehensive
picture of model uncertainty, CLM ensembles were set up with
perturbed meteorological input and uncertain initial states
in addition to uncertain parameters. C3 grass and C3 crops
were particularly sensitive to the perturbed meteorological
input, which resulted in a strong increase in the standard
deviation of the annual NEE sum (σ ∑ NEE) for the
different ensemble members from ∼ 2 to
3 g C m−2 yr−1 (with uncertain parameters) to
∼ 45 g C m−2 yr−1 (C3 grass) and
∼ 75 g C m−2 yr−1 (C3 crops) with
perturbed forcings. This increase in uncertainty is related
to the impact of the meteorological forcings on leaf onset
and senescence, and enhanced/reduced drought stress related
to perturbation of precipitation. The NEE uncertainty for
the forest plant functional type (PFT) was considerably
lower
(σ ∑ NEE ∼ 4.0–13.5 g C m−2 yr−1
with perturbed parameters, meteorological forcings and
initial states). We conclude that LAI and NEE uncertainty
with CLM is clearly underestimated if uncertain
meteorological forcings and initial states are not taken
into account.},
cin = {IBG-3 / JARA-HPC},
ddc = {570},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118 / $I:(DE-82)080012_20140620$},
pnm = {255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
(POF3-255) / Better predictions with environmental
simulation models: optimally integrating new data sources
$(jicg41_20100501)$},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255 / $G:(DE-Juel1)jicg41_20100501$},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000419815000003},
doi = {10.5194/bg-15-187-2018},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/843536},
}