% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Vgele:844039,
      author       = {Vögele, Stefan and Rübbelke, Dirk and Mayer, Philip and
                      Kuckshinrichs, Wilhelm},
      title        = {{G}ermany’s “{N}o” to carbon capture and storage:
                      {J}ust a question of lacking acceptance?},
      journal      = {Applied energy},
      volume       = {214},
      issn         = {0306-2619},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2018-01555},
      pages        = {205 - 218},
      year         = {2018},
      abstract     = {Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is frequently regarded as
                      a promising approach to mitigate global warming. Yet, by and
                      by CCS is losing political support. The key reason for that
                      is largely seen in the lack of public acceptance for this
                      technology. The absence of public acceptance, in turn, is in
                      particular due to the environmental risks ascribed to CCS
                      and the adverse effects this technology may create with
                      respect to the development of renewable energy technologies.
                      However, the effects of CCS are manifold and an adequate
                      evaluation of this technology should take into account
                      relevant aspects as comprehensively as possible. Since
                      sustainability indicators are not the only ones stakeholders
                      are interested in, attention also has to be paid to further
                      indicators. By means of a multi-criteria analysis
                      considering different scenarios, we investigate the
                      consequences of the application of CCS in Germany that may
                      serve as an alternative to an extension in the use of
                      renewable energies. In doing so, we employ a set of
                      indicators that also include factors distinct from
                      sustainably indicators. The results show that there is a
                      broad range of factors causing the future of CCS in the
                      German power sector to look gloomy.},
      cin          = {IEK-STE},
      ddc          = {620},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013},
      pnm          = {153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of
                      Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000426411300017},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.01.077},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/844039},
}