% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Feng:844159,
      author       = {Feng, Chunliang and Becker, Benjamin and Huang, Wenhao and
                      Wu, Xia and Eickhoff, Simon and Chen, Taolin},
      title        = {{N}eural substrates of the emotion-word and emotional
                      counting {S}troop tasks in healthy and clinical populations:
                      {A} meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies},
      journal      = {NeuroImage},
      volume       = {173},
      issn         = {1053-8119},
      address      = {Orlando, Fla.},
      publisher    = {Academic Press},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2018-01625},
      pages        = {258–274},
      year         = {2018},
      abstract     = {The emotional Stroop task (EST) is among the most
                      influential paradigms used to probe attention-related or
                      cognitive control-related emotional processing in healthy
                      subjects and clinical populations. The neuropsychological
                      mechanism underlying the emotional Stroop effect has
                      attracted extensive and long-lasting attention in both
                      cognitive and clinical psychology and neuroscience; however,
                      a precise characterization of the neural substrates
                      underlying the EST in healthy and clinical populations
                      remains elusive. Here, we implemented a coordinate-based
                      meta-analysis covering functional imaging studies that
                      employed the emotion-word or emotional counting Stroop
                      paradigms to determine the underlying neural networks in
                      healthy subjects and the trans-diagnostic alterations across
                      clinical populations. Forty-six publications were identified
                      that reported relevant contrasts (negative > neutral;
                      positive > neutral) for healthy or clinical populations
                      as well as for hyper- or hypo-activation of patients
                      compared to controls. We demonstrate consistent involvement
                      of the vlPFC and dmPFC in healthy subjects and consistent
                      involvement of the vlPFC in patients. We further identify a
                      trans-diagnostic pattern of hyper-activation in the
                      prefrontal and parietal regions. These findings underscore
                      the critical roles of cognitive control processes in the EST
                      and implicate trans-diagnostic cognitive control deficits.
                      Unlike the current models that emphasize the roles of the
                      amygdala and rACC, our findings implicate novel mechanisms
                      underlying the EST for both healthy and clinical
                      populations.},
      cin          = {INM-7},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
      pnm          = {571 - Connectivity and Activity (POF3-571)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-571},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:29496613},
      UT           = {WOS:000430366000021},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.023},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/844159},
}