% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Brezinsek:844180,
author = {Brezinsek, S. and Laengner, M. and Coenen, J. W. and
O’Mullane, M. G. and Pospieszczyk, A. and Sergienko, G.
and Samm, U.},
title = {{S}pectroscopic determination of inverse photon
efficiencies of {W} atoms in the scrape-off layer of
{TEXTOR}},
journal = {Physica scripta},
volume = {T170},
issn = {1402-4896},
address = {Bristol},
publisher = {IoP Publ.},
reportid = {FZJ-2018-01632},
pages = {014052 -},
year = {2017},
abstract = {Optical emission spectroscopy can be applied to determine
in situ tungsten particle fluxes from erosion processes at
plasma-facing materials. Inverse photon efficiencies convert
photon fluxes of WI and WII line transitions into W and
${{\rm{W}}}^{+}$ particle fluxes, respectively, dependening
on the local plasma conditions. Experiments in TEXTOR were
carried out to determine effective conversion factors for
different WI and WII transitions with the aid of WF6
injection into deuterium scrape-off layer plasmas in the
electron temperature T e range between
${T}_{{e}}=20\,\mathrm{eV}$ and ${T}_{{e}}=82\,\mathrm{eV}$.
The inverse photon efficiencies or so-called effective
$\tfrac{S}{{XB}}$-values have been determined for WI lines
at $\lambda =400.9\,\mathrm{nm}$, 429.5 nm, 488.7 nm, 498.3
nm, and 522.5 nm as well as for WII at $\lambda
=434.6\,\mathrm{nm}$ and compared with theoretical
calculations from the ADAS data base. Moreover, a
multi-machine scaling for the $\tfrac{S}{{XB}}$-value in the
range of T e between $2...100\,\mathrm{eV}$ has been
determined for the most prominent WI line at $\lambda
=400.9\,\mathrm{nm}$ to
$\tfrac{S}{{XB}}({T}_{{e}})=53.63-56.07\times
{e}^{(0.045\times {T}_{{e}}[\mathrm{eV}])}$ considering
experimental data from TEXTOR, ASDEX Upgrade, PSI and
PISCES. Comparison with ADAS calculations for the same
transition reveal a good qualitative agreement with the
dependence on T e , but an underestimation of ADAS
calculations of less than 25\% over the full covered range
of experimentally accessible T e in the multi-machine
scaling. A good agreement within the experimental
uncertainties is found between TEXTOR and ADAS
$\tfrac{S}{{XB}}$-values for WI at $\lambda
=429.5\,\mathrm{nm}$ and $\lambda =488.7\,\mathrm{nm}$
whereas an underestimation of up to a factor two of ADAS
values for WI at $\lambda =522.5\,\mathrm{nm}$ and $\lambda
=498.3\,\mathrm{nm}$ was measured. Potentially, reasons for
the discrepancy are an overestimation of applied ionisation
rate coefficients in ADAS for neutral W and a stronger
electron dependence n e for these transitions.},
cin = {IEK-4},
ddc = {530},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-4-20101013},
pnm = {174 - Plasma-Wall-Interaction (POF3-174)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-174},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000414120500052},
doi = {10.1088/1402-4896/aa8a45},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/844180},
}