% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Wulf:844308,
      author       = {Wulf, Christina and Zapp, Petra},
      title        = {{A}ssessment of system variations for hydrogen transport by
                      liquid organic hydrogen carriers},
      journal      = {International journal of hydrogen energy},
      volume       = {43},
      number       = {26},
      issn         = {0360-3199},
      address      = {New York, NY [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2018-01741},
      pages        = {11884-11895},
      year         = {2018},
      abstract     = {One option to transport hydrogen over longer distances in
                      the future is via Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carriers (LOHC).
                      They can store 6.2 $wt\%$ hydrogen by hydrogenation. The
                      most promising LOHCs are toluene and dibenzyltoluene.
                      However, for the dehydrogenation of the LOHCs e to release
                      the hydrogen again e temperatures above 300 C are needed,
                      leading to a high energy demand. Therefore, a Life Cycle
                      Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Costing are conducted. Both
                      assessments concentrate on the whole life cycle rather than
                      just direct emissions and investments. In total five
                      different systems are analysed with the major comparison
                      between conventional transport of hydrogen in a liquefied
                      state of matter and LOHCs. Variations include electricity
                      supply for liquefaction, heat supply for dehydrogenation and
                      the actual LOHC compound. The results show that from an
                      economic point of view transport via LOHCs is favourable
                      while from an environmental point of view transport of
                      liquid hydrogen is favourable.},
      cin          = {IEK-STE},
      ddc          = {660},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013},
      pnm          = {153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of
                      Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000438005200023},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.01.198},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/844308},
}