% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Koj:844351,
      author       = {Koj, Jan Christian and Wulf, Christina and Linssen, Jochen
                      and Schreiber, Andrea and Zapp, Petra},
      title        = {{U}tilisation of excess electricity in different
                      {P}ower-to-{T}ransport chains and their environmental
                      assessment},
      journal      = {Transportation research / D},
      volume       = {64},
      issn         = {1361-9209},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2018-01782},
      pages        = {23-35},
      year         = {2018},
      abstract     = {Future energy systems with dominating shares of
                      non-dispatchable renewable energy sources will be confronted
                      with excess electricity generation. Power-to-Transport
                      applications for passenger cars are a promising flexible
                      consumer for utilisation of excess electricity instead of
                      its curtailment.Goal of this article is to design and assess
                      future Power-to-Transport chains with regard to their
                      substitution potential of conventional passenger cars and
                      accompanying environmental impacts. This analysis focuses on
                      Germany in the year 2050 as one example for a future
                      renewable dominated energy system. As technologies battery
                      and fuel cell electric vehicles as well as synthetic natural
                      gas vehicles with internal combustion engines are analysed.
                      To guarantee fuel supply, energy storage options are taken
                      into account.Results show that excess electricity input
                      enables highest travelling distances for the battery
                      electric vehicle. This trend continues in the results of the
                      environmental performance of the Power-to-Transport chains.
                      With the lowest environmental impacts in eleven out of 13
                      categories battery electric vehicles show the best
                      environmental performance. Furthermore, a detailed
                      assessment of contributions from individual stages of the
                      Power-to-Transport chains to entire results revealed that
                      the vehicle construction dominates the majority of impact
                      categories.},
      cin          = {IEK-STE},
      ddc          = {380},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013},
      pnm          = {153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of
                      Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000449137100004},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.trd.2018.01.016},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/844351},
}