% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Varikuti:844359,
author = {Varikuti, Deepthi and Genon, Sarah and Sotiras, Aristeidis
and Schwender, Holger and Hoffstaedter, Felix and Patil,
Kaustubh and Jockwitz, Christiane and Caspers, Svenja and
Moebus, Susanne and Amunts, Katrin and Davatzikos, Christos
and Eickhoff, Simon},
title = {{E}valuation of non-negative matrix factorization of grey
matter in age prediction},
journal = {NeuroImage},
volume = {173},
issn = {1053-8119},
address = {Orlando, Fla.},
publisher = {Academic Press},
reportid = {FZJ-2018-01790},
pages = {394-410},
year = {2018},
abstract = {The relationship between grey matter volume (GMV) patterns
and age can be captured by multivariate pattern analysis,
allowing prediction of individuals' age based on structural
imaging. Raw data, voxel-wise GMV and non-sparse
factorization (with Principal Component Analysis, PCA) show
good performance but do not promote relatively localized
brain components for post-hoc examinations. Here we
evaluated a non-negative matrix factorization (NNMF)
approach to provide a reduced, but also interpretable
representation of GMV data in age prediction frameworks in
healthy and clinical populations.This examination was
performed using three datasets: a multi-site cohort of
life-span healthy adults, a single site cohort of older
adults and clinical samples from the ADNI dataset with
healthy subjects, participants with Mild Cognitive
Impairment and patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD)
subsamples. T1-weighted images were preprocessed with VBM8
standard settings to compute GMV values after normalization,
segmentation and modulation for non-linear transformations
only. Non-negative matrix factorization was computed on the
GM voxel-wise values for a range of granularities (50–690
components) and LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage and
Selection Operator) regression were used for age prediction.
First, we compared the performance of our data compression
procedure (i.e., NNMF) to various other approaches (i.e.,
uncompressed VBM data, PCA-based factorization and
parcellation-based compression). We then investigated the
impact of the granularity on the accuracy of age prediction,
as well as the transferability of the factorization and
model generalization across datasets. We finally validated
our framework by examining age prediction in ADNI samples.},
cin = {INM-1 / INM-7},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-1-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
pnm = {571 - Connectivity and Activity (POF3-571) / HBP SGA1 -
Human Brain Project Specific Grant Agreement 1 (720270) /
SMHB - Supercomputing and Modelling for the Human Brain
(HGF-SMHB-2013-2017)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-571 / G:(EU-Grant)720270 /
G:(DE-Juel1)HGF-SMHB-2013-2017},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:29518572},
UT = {WOS:000430366000033},
doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.03.007},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/844359},
}