% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Wiedemann:844488,
      author       = {Wiedemann, Peter M. and Schutz, Holger and Peters, Hans
                      Peter},
      title        = {{I}nformation {N}eeds {C}oncerning a {P}lanned {W}aste
                      {I}ncineration {F}acility},
      journal      = {Risk analysis},
      volume       = {11},
      number       = {2},
      issn         = {1539-6924},
      address      = {Oxford [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Wiley-Blackwell},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2018-01902},
      pages        = {229 - 237},
      year         = {1991},
      abstract     = {Waste management has become a major environmental issue in
                      Germany. The siting of waste incineration especially arouses
                      strong local opposition. The study presented here is related
                      to such a case (i.e., a planned waste incineration facility
                      in a small West German village). The study is based on a
                      telephone survey aimed at the information needs of the
                      residents. Two topics are stressed: (1) the thematic
                      relevance of the siting project as seen by the public; and
                      (2) the residents’information needs. The results show that
                      a majority of residents are concerned about the planned
                      facility, and the most important topics of their information
                      needs refer to the risks and the safety systems of the
                      planned facility, as well as information about waste
                      management alternatives. Furthermore, the information needs
                      depend on the personal relevance of the issue and the
                      perceived knowledge deficit about it. Conclusions are drawn
                      with regard to the design of a risk communication program.
                      Here, four groups of residents are distinguished in terms of
                      knowledge and motivation and, thus, need to be approached in
                      different ways.},
      cin          = {INM-8},
      ddc          = {300},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-8-20090406},
      pnm          = {899 - ohne Topic (POF3-899)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:A1991FT98400011},
      doi          = {10.1111/j.1539-6924.1991.tb00599.x},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/844488},
}