000844494 001__ 844494
000844494 005__ 20210129232937.0
000844494 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01161.x
000844494 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0272-4332
000844494 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1539-6924
000844494 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:3375502
000844494 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:A1988N161900018
000844494 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:14481384
000844494 037__ $$aFZJ-2018-01904
000844494 082__ $$a300
000844494 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aJungermann, Helmut$$b0
000844494 245__ $$aMental models in risk assessment: Informing people about drugs
000844494 260__ $$aOxford [u.a.]$$bWiley-Blackwell$$c1988
000844494 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000844494 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000844494 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1521101102_16844
000844494 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000844494 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000844494 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000844494 520__ $$aOne way to communicate about the risks of drugs is through the use of package inserts. The problems associated with this medium of informing patients have been investigated by several researchers who found that people require information about drugs they are using, including extensive risk information, and that they are willing to take this information into account in their usage of drugs. But empirical results also show that people easily misinterpret the information given. A conceptual framework is proposed that might be used for better understanding the cognitive processes involved in such a type of risk assessment and communication. It is based on the idea that people develop, through experience, a mental model of how a drug works, which effects it might produce, that contraindications have to be considered, etc. This mental model is “run” when a specific package insert has been read and a specific question arises such as, for example, whether certain symptoms can be explained as normal or whether they require special attention and action. We argue that the mental model approach offers a useful perspective for examining how people understand package inserts, and consequently for improving their content and design. The approach promises to be equally useful for other aspects of risk analysis that are dependent upon human judgment and decision making, e.g., threat diagnosis and human reliability analysis.
000844494 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899$$a899 - ohne Topic (POF3-899)$$cPOF3-899$$fPOF III$$x0
000844494 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000844494 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131903$$aSchütz, Holger$$b1
000844494 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aThüring, Manfred$$b2
000844494 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2001458-2$$a10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01161.x$$gVol. 8, no. 1, p. 147 - 155$$n1$$p147 - 155$$tRisk analysis$$v8$$x1539-6924$$y1988
000844494 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/844494/files/Jungermann_et_al-1988-Risk_Analysis.pdf$$yRestricted
000844494 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/844494/files/Jungermann_et_al-1988-Risk_Analysis.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yRestricted
000844494 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/844494/files/Jungermann_et_al-1988-Risk_Analysis.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yRestricted
000844494 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/844494/files/Jungermann_et_al-1988-Risk_Analysis.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yRestricted
000844494 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/844494/files/Jungermann_et_al-1988-Risk_Analysis.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yRestricted
000844494 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/844494/files/Jungermann_et_al-1988-Risk_Analysis.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000844494 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:844494$$pVDB
000844494 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000844494 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bRISK ANAL : 2015
000844494 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000844494 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000844494 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000844494 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000844494 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000844494 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000844494 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000844494 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0130$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSocial Sciences Citation Index
000844494 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1180$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences
000844494 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000844494 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131903$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000844494 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-890$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-800$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bProgrammungebundene Forschung$$lohne Programm$$vohne Topic$$x0
000844494 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-8-20090406$$kINM-8$$lEthik in den Neurowissenschaften$$x0
000844494 980__ $$ajournal
000844494 980__ $$aVDB
000844494 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-8-20090406
000844494 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED